A review of parallel computing applications in calibrating watershed hydrologic models

被引:26
作者
Asgari, Marjan [1 ]
Yang, Wanhong [1 ]
Lindsay, John [1 ]
Tolson, Bryan [2 ]
Dehnavi, Maryam Mehri [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Environm & Geomat, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Comp Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Parallel computing; Hydrologic model calibration; Optimization algorithms; Parallel speedup; Parallel efficiency; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SWAT; ALGORITHM; TOOL; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105370
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent decades, parallel computing has been increasingly applied to address the computational challenges of calibrating watershed hydrologic models. The purpose of this paper is to review these parallelization studies to summarize their contributions, identify knowledge gaps, and propose future research directions. These studies parallelized models based on either random-sampling-based algorithms or optimization algorithms and demonstrated considerable parallel speedup gain and parallel efficiency. However, the speedup gain/efficiency decreases as the number of parallel processing units increases, particularly after a threshold. In future, various combinations of hydrologic models, optimization algorithms, parallelization strategies, parallelization architectures, and communication modes need to be implemented to systematically evaluate a suite of parallelization scenarios for improving speedup gain, efficiency, and solution quality. A standardized suite of performance evaluation metrics needs to be developed to evaluate these parallelization approaches. Interactive multiobjective optimization algorithms and/or integrated sensitivity analysis and calibration algorithms are potential future research fields, as well.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   An efficient surrogate-based simulation-optimization method for calibrating a regional MODFLOW model [J].
Chen, Mingjie ;
Izady, Azizallah ;
Abdalla, Osman A. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 544 :591-603
[12]  
Crainic TG, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V146, P497, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1665-5_17
[13]  
Dawdy D.R., 1965, J HYDRAUL DIV AM SOC, V91, P123
[14]   One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review [J].
Efstratiadis, Andreas ;
Koutsoyiannis, Demetris .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2010, 55 (01) :58-78
[15]  
Fang Liu, 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1237, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1237/5/052010
[16]   Parallel evolutionary computation for multiobjective gene interaction analysis [J].
Goncalves, Francisco ;
Santander-Jimenez, Sergio ;
Sousa, Leonel ;
Granado-Criado, Jose M. ;
Ilic, Aleksandar .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 40
[17]   Multi-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modeling [J].
Gong, W. ;
Duan, Q. ;
Li, J. ;
Wang, C. ;
Di, Z. ;
Dai, Y. ;
Ye, A. ;
Miao, C. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (05) :2409-2425
[18]   Borg: An Auto-Adaptive Many-Objective Evolutionary Computing Framework [J].
Hadka, David ;
Reed, Patrick .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2013, 21 (02) :231-259
[19]   A REVIEW OF TECHNIQUES FOR PARAMETER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL-MODELS [J].
HAMBY, DM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1994, 32 (02) :135-154
[20]   Parallel Genetic Algorithms: A Useful Survey [J].
Harada, Tomohiro ;
Alba, Enrique .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2020, 53 (04)