A review of parallel computing applications in calibrating watershed hydrologic models

被引:26
作者
Asgari, Marjan [1 ]
Yang, Wanhong [1 ]
Lindsay, John [1 ]
Tolson, Bryan [2 ]
Dehnavi, Maryam Mehri [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Environm & Geomat, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Comp Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Parallel computing; Hydrologic model calibration; Optimization algorithms; Parallel speedup; Parallel efficiency; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SWAT; ALGORITHM; TOOL; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105370
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent decades, parallel computing has been increasingly applied to address the computational challenges of calibrating watershed hydrologic models. The purpose of this paper is to review these parallelization studies to summarize their contributions, identify knowledge gaps, and propose future research directions. These studies parallelized models based on either random-sampling-based algorithms or optimization algorithms and demonstrated considerable parallel speedup gain and parallel efficiency. However, the speedup gain/efficiency decreases as the number of parallel processing units increases, particularly after a threshold. In future, various combinations of hydrologic models, optimization algorithms, parallelization strategies, parallelization architectures, and communication modes need to be implemented to systematically evaluate a suite of parallelization scenarios for improving speedup gain, efficiency, and solution quality. A standardized suite of performance evaluation metrics needs to be developed to evaluate these parallelization approaches. Interactive multiobjective optimization algorithms and/or integrated sensitivity analysis and calibration algorithms are potential future research fields, as well.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Abbaspour KC, 2007, MODSIM 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, P1603
[2]  
Abbaspour KC, 2004, VADOSE ZONE J, V3, P1340
[3]  
Adeleye Babasegun., 2017, INT J COMPUT TRENDS, V53, P6
[4]   Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization [J].
Audet, Charles ;
Bigeon, Jean ;
Cartier, Dominique ;
Le Digabel, Sebastien ;
Salomon, Ludovic .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 292 (02) :397-422
[5]  
Bacu Victor, 2011, 2011 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation, P193
[6]   GLUE: 20 years on [J].
Beven, Keith ;
Binley, Andrew .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (24) :5897-5918
[7]   Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison [J].
Blum, C ;
Roli, A .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2003, 35 (03) :268-308
[8]  
Calaor AE, 2002, I-SPAN'02: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL ARCHITECTURES, ALGORITHMS AND NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, P39, DOI 10.1109/ISPAN.2002.1004258
[9]   Reducing communication costs in collective I/O in multi-core cluster systems with non-exclusive scheduling [J].
Cha, Kwangho ;
Maeng, Seungryoul .
JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2012, 61 (03) :966-996
[10]  
Chapman T.G., 1970, S RESULTS RES REPRES, V96, P126