Utilization of Surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare Population - A Cohort Study

被引:8
作者
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris [1 ]
Fedewa, Stacey [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Chun Chieh [2 ]
Virgo, Katherine S. [4 ]
Jemal, Ahmedin [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Intramural Res Dept, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; COLONOSCOPY; POLYPS; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0110937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Surveillance in patients with previous polypectomy was underused in the Medicare population in 1994. This study investigates whether expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has reduced the inappropriate use of surveillance. Methods: We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate time to surveillance and polyp recurrence rates for Medicare beneficiaries with a colonoscopy with polypectomy between 1998 and 2003 who were followed through 2008 for receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate risk factors for: 1) failing to undergo surveillance and 2) polyp recurrence among these individuals. Analyses were stratified into three 2-year cohorts based on baseline colonoscopy date. Results: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a colonoscopy with polypectomy in the 1998-1999 (n = 4,136), 2000-2001 (n = 3,538) and 2002-2003 (n = 4,655) cohorts had respective probabilities of 30%, 26% and 20% (p<0.001) of subsequent surveillance events within 3 years. At the same time, 58%, 52% and 45% (p<0.001) of beneficiaries received a surveillance event within 5 years. Polyp recurrence rates after 5 years were 36%, 30% and 26% (p<0.001) respectively. Older age (>= 70 years), female gender, later cohort (2000-2001 & 2002-2003), and severe comorbidity were the most important risk factors for failure to undergo a surveillance event. Male gender and early cohort (1998-1999) were the most important risk factors for polyp recurrence. Conclusions: Expansion of Medicare reimbursement for colonoscopy screening in high-risk individuals has not reduced underutilization of surveillance in the Medicare population. It is important to take action now to improve this situation, because polyp recurrence is substantial in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Surveillance patterns and polyp recurrence following diagnosis and excision of colorectal polyps in a Medicare population [J].
Amonkar, MM ;
Hunt, TL ;
Zhou, ZY ;
Jin, XD .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (02) :417-421
[2]   Colorectal screening after polypectomy: A national survey study of primary care physicians [J].
Boolchand, Vikram ;
Olds, Gregory ;
Singh, Joseph ;
Singh, Pankaj ;
Chak, Amitabh ;
Cooper, Gregory S. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (09) :654-659
[3]   Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Detection and Removal of Adenomas at Colonoscopy: Population-Based Case-Control Study [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Rickert, Alexander ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (24) :2969-2976
[4]   Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Cooper, Gregory S. ;
Kou, Tzuyung D. ;
Sloan, Jill S. Barnholtz ;
Koroukian, Siran M. ;
Schluchter, Mark D. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (10) :1800-1807
[5]   Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy [J].
de Jonge, V. ;
Nicolaas, J. Sint ;
van Leerdam, M. E. ;
Kuipers, E. J. ;
van Zanten, S. J. O. Veldhuyzen .
ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (07) :560-572
[6]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[7]   Prevalence of colonic neoplasia and advanced lesions in the normal population: a prospective population-based colonoscopy study [J].
Forsberg, Anna M. ;
Kjellstrom, Lars ;
Agreus, Lars ;
Andreasson, Anna Nixon ;
Nyhlin, Henry ;
Talley, Nicholas J. ;
Bjorck, Erik .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 47 (02) :184-190
[8]   Relation between Medicare screening reimbursement and stage at diagnosis for older patients with colon cancer [J].
Gross, Cary P. ;
Andersen, Martin S. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. ;
McAvay, Gail J. ;
Proctor, Deborah ;
Tinetti, Mary E. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (23) :2815-2822
[9]   Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation [J].
Hanley, JA ;
Negassa, A ;
Edwardes, MDD ;
Forrester, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (04) :364-375
[10]   Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings [J].
Imperiale, TF ;
Wagner, DR ;
Lin, CY ;
Larkin, GN ;
Rogge, JD ;
Ransohoff, DF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (03) :169-174