The OCI-4: An ultra-brief screening scale for obsessive-compulsive disorder

被引:15
作者
Abramovitch, Amitai [1 ]
Abramowitz, Jonathan S. [2 ]
McKay, Dean [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas State Univ, Dept Psychol, 601 Univ Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Fordham Univ, Dept Psychol, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
关键词
OCD; Brief screening measure; Assessment; Treatment sensitivity; Anxiety disorders; PRIMARY-CARE; ANXIETY DISORDERS; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION; PREVALENCE; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102354
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and burdensome condition that is typically assessed using indepth interviews or lengthy self-report measures. Accordingly, routine screening in busy non-mental health settings is impractical, and OCD is often under-(or mis-) recognized. We evaluated an ultra-brief version of a widely used self-report measure, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), which may be employed as a routine screener for OCD. A total of 1087 adults diagnosed with OCD, 1306 unselected adults from the community, and 423 adults with anxiety related disorders completed the OCI-R along with measures of anxiety and mood. Analyses were conducted to reduce the number of items and examine evidence for sensitivity and specificity to OCD clinical status, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to treatment, and convergent and discriminant validity. Four items that optimally assess different dimensions of OCD (washing, checking, ordering, obsessing) were identified. Psychometric evaluation revealed good to excellent test-retest reliability, validity, prediction of clinical OCD status, and sensitivity to treatment. A 4-item version of the OCI-R, called the OCI-4, shows promise as an ultra-brief screening tool for identifying likely OCD in settings where in-depth assessment is impractical. Patients with a positive screen may be referred for further evaluation and appropriate treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abramowitz J.S., 2008, A guide to assessments that work, P275
[2]   Assessment of Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Dimensions: Development and Evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale [J].
Abramowitz, Jonathan S. ;
Deacon, Brett J. ;
Olatunji, Bunmi O. ;
Wheaton, Michael G. ;
Berman, Noah C. ;
Losardo, Diane ;
Timpano, Kiara R. ;
McGrath, Patrick B. ;
Riemann, Bradley C. ;
Adams, Thomas ;
Bjorgvinsson, Throestur ;
Storch, Eric A. ;
Hale, Lisa R. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 22 (01) :180-198
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V), V5th, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[4]   Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to Screen for Major Depression in the Primary Care Population [J].
Arroll, Bruce ;
Goodyear-Smith, Felicity ;
Crengle, Susan ;
Gunn, Jane ;
Kerse, Ngaire ;
Fishman, Tana ;
Falloon, Karen ;
Hatcher, Simon .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 8 (04) :348-353
[5]   A rose by any other name ... How should we refer to the collective of conditions characterized by clinically significant anxiety? [J].
Asmundson, Gordon J. G. .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2019, 68
[6]  
BAER L, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P1737
[7]  
Beck A.T., 1996, San Antonio, V78, P490
[8]   A hidden problem: consequences of the misdiagnosis of perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Challacombe, Fiona L. ;
Wroe, Abigail L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (610) :275-276
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[10]  
De Ayala R. J., 2009, The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory