Comparison of the sorption behaviors and mechanisms of perfluorosulfonates and, perfluorocarboxylic acids on three kinds of clay minerals

被引:181
作者
Zhao, Lixia [1 ]
Bian, Jingna [1 ]
Zhang, Yahui [2 ]
Zhu, Lingyan [1 ]
Liu, Zhengtao [2 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin Key Lab Environm Remediat & Pollut, Key Lab Pollut Proc & Environm Criteria,Minist Ed, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
关键词
Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs); Sorption mechanisms; Clay minerals; Electrostatic interaction; Complexation; Hydrogen bonding; IRON-OXIDE SURFACES; PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONATE; PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS; QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; ADSORPTION; WATER; DESORPTION; SEDIMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The sorption of four perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) [perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)] on three typical minerals [montmorillonite (MM), kaolinite (KL) and hematite (HM)] was studied. The sorption of PFOS and PFHxS was much stronger than PFOA and PFHxA. The sorption of each PFAA on the minerals followed an order of HM > ML> MM, even though MM was positively while ML and HM were negatively charged, implying that the sorption is driven by some other interactions besides electrostatic attraction. The sorption decreased with an increase in pH and a decrease in ionic strength of the solution, and their impacts on PFOS were much stronger than other three PFAAs. Surface complexing and hydrogen-bonding could make great contributions to the sorption of PFOS on the minerals. The results are important for understanding the transport and fate of PFAAs in sediment and ground water. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Longitudinal and Latitudinal Distribution of Perfluoroalkyl Compounds in the Surface Water of the Atlantic Ocean [J].
Ahrens, Lutz ;
Barber, Jonathan L. ;
Xie, Zhiyong ;
Ebinghaus, Ralf .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (09) :3122-3127
[2]   Perfluorinated compounds in sediments from the Daliao River system of northeast China [J].
Bao, Jia ;
Jin, Yihe ;
Liu, Wei ;
Ran, Xiaorong ;
Zhang, Zhixu .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2009, 77 (05) :652-657
[3]   Prediction of Aqueous Solubility, Vapor Pressure and Critical Micelle Concentration for Aquatic Partitioning of Perfluorinated Chemicals (vol 45, pg 8120, 2011) [J].
Bhhatarai, Barun ;
Gramatica, Paola .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (01) :566-566
[4]   Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars [J].
Chun, Y ;
Sheng, GY ;
Chiou, CT ;
Xing, BS .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (17) :4649-4655
[5]   Transport of ammonium perfluorooctanoate in environmental media near a fluoropolymer manufacturing facility [J].
Davis, Katherine L. ;
Aucoin, Michael D. ;
Larsen, Barbara S. ;
Kaiser, Mary A. ;
Hartten, Andrew S. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 67 (10) :2011-2019
[6]   Sorption mechanisms of perfluorinated compounds on carbon nanotubes [J].
Deng, Shubo ;
Zhang, Qiaoying ;
Nie, Yao ;
Wei, Haoran ;
Wang, Bin ;
Huang, Jun ;
Yu, Gang ;
Xing, Baoshan .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2012, 168 :138-144
[7]   Adsorption of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid to iron oxide surfaces as studied by flow-through ATR-FTIR spectroscopy [J].
Gao, Xiaodong ;
Chorover, Jon .
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 9 (02) :148-157
[8]   Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife [J].
Giesy, JP ;
Kannan, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (07) :1339-1342
[9]   ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION OF NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER ON IRON-OXIDE - MECHANISMS AND MODELS [J].
GU, BH ;
SCHMITT, J ;
CHEN, ZH ;
LIANG, LY ;
MCCARTHY, JF .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 28 (01) :38-46
[10]   Quantitative characterization of trace levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Tennessee River [J].
Hansen, KJ ;
Johnson, HO ;
Eldridge, JS ;
Butenhoff, JL ;
Dick, LA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (08) :1681-1685