Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care

被引:20
作者
Lagendijk, Mirelle [1 ,2 ]
Mittendorf, Elizabeth [3 ,4 ]
King, Tari A. [3 ,4 ]
Gibbons, Christopher [3 ,5 ]
Pusic, Andrea [5 ,6 ]
Dominici, Laura S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amphia Hosp, Dept Surg, Breda, Netherlands
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Breast Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Dana Farber Brigham & Womens Canc Ctr, Breast Oncol Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Patient Reported Outcomes Value & Experience PROV, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Plast Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life; Breast cancer surgery; Value-based cancer care; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONSERVING THERAPY; EORTC QLQ-C30; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; CENTERED OUTCOMES; STANDARD SET; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; CANCER CARE;
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0355
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Value in health care is defined as the health outcome achieved per unit of cost. For health care systems, improving value means achieving better outcomes at lower costs. Improving outcomes, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as well as more established metrics such as mortality and complication rates, ensures high-quality care. This is particularly true in breast cancer surgery, where survival and recurrence rates are comparable across different surgical approaches. Outcomes reflecting survivorship quality may therefore better inform decision making regarding surgical approaches. PROs can be assessed using validated instruments known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). They are obtained directly from patients reflecting their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Ongoing initiatives strive to define PROMs that accurately reflect HRQOL and demonstrate value, with the goal of establishing benchmarks for quality of care. Clinicians caring for patients with breast cancer are well positioned to be involved in defining meaningful measures of value-based breast cancer care. This article reviews value-based breast cancer care in the context of locoregional therapy, with attention paid to the work done by the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures in which a "standard set" of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer for international use is defined. In addition, an overview is provided of relevant PROMs and previously reported scores. Recommendations and future challenges for implementation of routine collection of PROs are also discussed. Implications for Practice Opportunity exists to act as early adopters of the routine collection of longitudinal patient-reported outcome data for breast cancer, allowing transition of current care to value-based cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Disease-Specific Survival for Early-Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Agarwal, Shailesh ;
Pappas, Lisa ;
Neumayer, Leigh ;
Kokeny, Kristine ;
Agarwal, Jayant .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) :267-274
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW APPR SURG MEAS P
[4]   Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study [J].
Arndt, Volker ;
Stegmaier, Christa ;
Ziegler, Hartwig ;
Brenner, Hermann .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 134 (12) :1311-1318
[5]   A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures [J].
Atisha, Dunya M. ;
Rushing, Christel N. ;
Samsa, Gregory P. ;
Locklear, Tracie D. ;
Cox, Charlie E. ;
Hwang, E. Shelley ;
Zenn, Michael R. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) :361-369
[6]   The impact of age on changes in quality of life among breast cancer survivors treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy [J].
Bantema-Joppe, E. J. ;
de Bock, G. H. ;
Woltman-van Iersel, M. ;
Busz, D. M. ;
Ranchor, A. V. ;
Langendijk, J. A. ;
Maduro, J. H. ;
van den Heuvel, E. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (04) :636-643
[7]   Analysis of outcomes and patient’s satisfaction following monolateral and bilateral mastectomy using BREAST-Q [J].
Barone M. ;
Cogliandro A. ;
Tambone V. ;
Persichetti P. .
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018, 41 (3) :311-316
[8]   Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Deal, Allison M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Hudis, Clifford ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (02) :197-198
[9]   Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer [J].
Bedard, Gillian ;
Zeng, Liang ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Lauzon, Natalie ;
Holden, Lori ;
Tsao, May ;
Danjoux, Cyril ;
Barnes, Elizabeth ;
Sahgal, Arjun ;
Poon, Michael ;
Chow, Edward .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 (02) :109-117
[10]   The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment [J].
Cella, David ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Choi, Seung .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (Suppl 1) :133-141