Movement control tests for the lumbopelvic complex. Are these tests reliable and valid?

被引:8
作者
Granstrom, Hannah [1 ]
Ang, Bjorn O. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen-Barr, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Physiotherapy, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Falun, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Funct Area Occupat Therapy & Physiotherapy, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Low-back pain; movement control; reproducibility of results; test; validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; MOTOR CONTROL; LUMBAR SPINE; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; KAPPA; IMPAIRMENTS; INTERRATER;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2017.1318422
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study evaluated inter- and intra-observer reliability and discriminative validity of three movement control tests: 1) standing knee-lift test; 2) static lunge test; and 3) dynamic lunge test. Thirty-eight subjects, 21 with low-back pain and 17 healthy, were video-recorded while performing the tests. Four physical therapists scored the tests according to a standardized protocol and calculated a composite score for each test based on the number of incorrect test components. Inter-observer reliability for the composite scores ranged between 0.68 and 0.80 (ICC 2,k) and intra-observer reliability between 0.54 and0.82 (ICC 2,1). The separate test components ranged between 0.32 and 0.91 ((free)) for inter-observer reliability and 0.42 and1.00 for intra-observer reliability. Test components showing the highest values were: back extension; arm lowering; and shoulders moving backwards. Components hip hitch, trunk lateral flexion, knee not lifted straight up and hips moving backwards did not reach accepted thresholds. Discriminative validity ranged between 0.47 and 0.56 (AUC). As our results showed an overall good agreement for the composite, scores and for the majority of the included test components the tests can be considered reliable enough. As the tests' discriminative ability was close to none, they should, however, not be used for diagnostic purposes but should be further evaluated toward predicted validity.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 397
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118032923
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials
  • [3] Bardenett SM, 2015, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V10, P303
  • [4] Using prevalence indices to aid interpretation and comparison of agreement ratings between two or more observers
    Burn, Charlotte C.
    Weir, Alex A. S.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 188 (02) : 166 - 170
  • [5] BIAS, PREVALENCE AND KAPPA
    BYRT, T
    BISHOP, J
    CARLIN, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [6] Clinical screening tests for assessing movement control in non-specific low-back pain. A systematic review of intra- and inter-observer reliability studies
    Carlsson, Hannah
    Rasmussen-Barr, Eva
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2013, 18 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [7] Evaluating Common Outcomes for Measuring Treatment Success for Chronic Low Back Pain
    Chapman, Jens R.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T.
    Bransford, Richard J.
    DeVine, John
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Lee, Michael J.
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) : S54 - S68
  • [8] The inter-examiner reliability of a classification method for non-specific chronic low back pain patients with motor control impairment
    Dankaerts, W
    O'Sullivan, PB
    Straker, LM
    Burnett, AF
    Skouen, JS
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [9] Interrater and Intrarater Reliability' of the Active Hip Abduction Test
    Davis, Alice M.
    Bridge, Patrick
    Miller, Jason
    Nelson-Wong, Erika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (12) : 953 - 960
  • [10] Elphinston J, 2014, STABILITY SPORT PERF