Lateral orbitofrontal cortex promotes trial-by-trial learning of risky, but not spatial, biases

被引:23
作者
Constantinople, Christine M. [1 ,4 ]
Piet, Alex T. [1 ,5 ]
Bibawi, Peter [1 ]
Akrami, Athena [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kopec, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Brody, Carlos D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Neurosci Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Mol Biol, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] NYU, Ctr Neural Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA
[5] Allen Inst Brain Sci, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Sainsbury Wellcome Ctr, London, England
来源
ELIFE | 2019年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MEDIODORSAL THALAMIC NUCLEUS; BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; HOT-HAND; RAT; REPRESENTATION; NEURONS; DISSOCIATION; COMPUTATIONS; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.49744
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Individual choices are not made in isolation but are embedded in a series of past experiences, decisions, and outcomes. The effects of past experiences on choices, often called sequential biases, are ubiquitous in perceptual and value-based decision-making, but their neural substrates are unclear. We trained rats to choose between cued guaranteed and probabilistic rewards in a task in which outcomes on each trial were independent. Behavioral variability often reflected sequential effects, including increased willingness to take risks following risky wins, and spatial 'win-stay/lose-shift' biases. Recordings from lateral orbitofrontal cortex (IOFC) revealed encoding of reward history and receipt, and optogenetic inhibition of IOFC eliminated rats' increased preference for risk following risky wins, but spared other sequential effects. Our data show that different sequential biases are neurally dissociable, and the IOFC's role in adaptive behavior promotes learning of more abstract biases (here, biases for the risky option), but not spatial ones.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [11] The Gambler's fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos
    Croson, R
    Sundali, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2005, 30 (03) : 195 - 209
  • [12] Multifaceted Contributions by Different Regions of the Orbitofrontal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Probabilistic Reversal Learning
    Dalton, Gemma L.
    Wang, Nena Y.
    Phillips, Anthony G.
    Floresco, Stan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (06) : 1996 - 2006
  • [13] Representation of spatial goals in rat orbitofrontal cortex
    Feierstein, Claudia E.
    Quirk, Michael C.
    Uchida, Naoshige
    Sosulski, Dara L.
    Mainen, Zachary F.
    [J]. NEURON, 2006, 51 (04) : 495 - 507
  • [14] Gallagher M, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P6610
  • [15] Absence of Spatial Tuning in the Orbitofrontal Cortex
    Grattan, Lauren E.
    Glimcher, Paul W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [16] Green L., 1995, EC CHOICE THEORY EXP, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511664854, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511664854]
  • [18] Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation
    Hanks, Timothy D.
    Kopec, Charles D.
    Brunton, Bingni W.
    Duan, Chunyu A.
    Erlich, Jeffrey C.
    Brody, Carlos D.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 520 (7546) : 220 - U195
  • [19] Posterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates Outcome-Contingent Allocation of Behavior
    Hayden, Benjamin Y.
    Nair, Amrita C.
    Mccoy, Allison N.
    Platt, Michael L.
    [J]. NEURON, 2008, 60 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [20] Circuit-Based Corticostriatal Homologies Between Rat and Primate
    Heilbronner, Sarah R.
    Rodriguez-Romaguera, Jose
    Quirk, Gregory J.
    Groenewegen, Henk J.
    Haber, Suzanne N.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 80 (07) : 509 - 521