The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution

被引:33
作者
Sandin, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Philosophy Unit, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
precautionary principle; precaution; uncertainty;
D O I
10.3197/0963271042772613
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The precautionary principle is frequently invoked in environmental law and policy, and the debate around the principle indicates that there is little agreement on what 'taking precautions' means. The purpose of the present paper is to provide an improved conceptual foundation for this debate in the form of an explication of the concept of precaution. Distinctions between precaution and two related concepts, prevention and pessimism, are briefly discussed. The concept of precaution is analysed in terms of precautionary actions. It is argued that precautionary actions are implicitly assumed to be precautionary with respect to something, and that this assumption should be made explicit. A definition of a precautionary action involving three necessary and jointly sufficient conditions (intentionality, uncertainty and reasonableness) is proposed, and the implications of this analysis for the debate on the precautionary principle are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 475
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROTECTING PUBLIC HL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, PHILOS QUART, DOI DOI 10.2307/2218332
[3]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC AFFAIRS Q
[4]  
[Anonymous], RETHINKING RISK PREC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The Precautionary Principle in International Law
[6]   SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE [J].
BODANSKY, D .
ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 33 (07) :4-&
[7]  
BREYMAN S, 1999, 1999 ANN M AAAS AN C
[8]  
*CEC, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0202
[9]  
Charnley Gail, 2000, RISK Newsletter, V20, P3
[10]   Preemptive prevention [J].
Collins, J .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2000, 97 (04) :223-234