Dimensionality and higher-order factor structure of self-reported emotional intelligence

被引:13
作者
Barchard, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Christensen, Michelle M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
emotional intelligence; trait EI; ability EI; Multidimensional Emotional Intelligence Assessment MEIA; higher-order confirmatory factory analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In 1990, Salovey and Mayer posited a ten-dimensional model of Emotional Intelligence that included three broad areas: (a) Appraisal and Expression of Emotion, (b) Regulation of Emotion, and (c) Utilization of Emotion. In the intervening decade and a half, researchers have not yet demonstrated that all of these dimensions can be empirically distinguished using self-report measures. Furthermore, research has not established what higher-order factors may relate these dimensions to each other, or whether higher-order factors can explain the relationships between the first-order factors. The Multidimensional Emotional Intelligence Assessment (MEIA; Tett, Fox, & Wang, 2005) is a new self-report measure designed to provide separate measurement of the ten Salovey and Mayer dimensions. This study shows that a ten-dimensional model fit the data well, and the ten factors had mostly small to moderate correlations. Higher-order factors exist, but were not able to account for the relationships between the first-order factors: correlated disturbance terms were also needed. There appears to be a trade-off between separate measurement of all dimensions and the simplicity of the higher-order factor structure. Researchers and test users should continue to report scores on the first-order scales, rather than summarizing scores at the level of higher-order factors. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 985
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Using Multivariate Statistics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, DOI DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[4]   Assessing Sources of Error in Structural Equation Models: The Effects of Sample Size, Reliability, and Model Misspecification [J].
Bandalos, Deborah L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 4 (03) :177-192
[5]   The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling [J].
Bandalos, DL .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (01) :78-102
[6]  
Boyatzis RE, 2004, MEASURING EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: COMMON GROUND AND CONTROVERSY, P147
[7]  
Browne M. W., 1993, Testing structural equation models, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[8]  
Bryne B.M., 2006, Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, V2nd
[9]   Dimensions of emotional intelligence and their relationships with social coping among gifted adolescents in Hong Kong [J].
Chan, DW .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2003, 32 (06) :409-418
[10]  
Costa P.T., 1992, PROFESSIONAL MANUAL