Life Cycle Environmental Impact of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at a Power Plant in the Greater Houston Area

被引:14
作者
Kommalapati, Raghava Rao [1 ,2 ]
Hossan, Iqbal [1 ]
Botlaguduru, Venkata Sai Vamsi [1 ]
Du, Hongbo [1 ]
Huque, Ziaul [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Prairie View A&M Univ, Ctr Energy & Environm Sustainabil, Prairie View, TX 77446 USA
[2] Prairie View A&M Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Prairie View, TX 77446 USA
[3] Prairie View A&M Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Prairie View, TX 77446 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
W. A. Parish power plant; life cycle assessment; mid-point impacts; end-point impacts; biomass co-firing; FOREST BIOMASS; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; EMISSIONS; TECHNOLOGY; GENERATION; TRANSPORT; RESIDUES; CAPTURE; HARVEST;
D O I
10.3390/su10072193
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electricity generation from coal is one of the leading contributors to greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. and has adverse effects on the environment. Biomass from forest residue can be co-fired with coal to reduce the impact of fossil-fuel power plants on the environment. W. A. Parish power plant (WAP, Richmond, TX, USA) located in the greater Houston area is the largest coal and natural gas-based power generation facility in Texas and is the subject of the current study. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed with SimaPro (R) and IMPACT 2002+ method, for the replacement of 5%, 10%, and 15% coal (energy-basis) with forest residue at the WAP power plant in Texas. Results from the LCA study indicate that life cycle air emissions of CO2, CO, SO2, PM2.5, NOX, and VOC could reduce by 13.5%, 6.4%, 9.5%, 9.2%, 11.6%, and 7.7% respectively when 15% of coal is replaced with forest residue. Potential life cycle impact decreased across 9 mid-point impact categories of, human/aquatic toxicity, respiratory organics/inorganics, global warming, non-renewable energy, mineral extraction, aquatic acidification, and terrestrial acidification/nitrification. The potential impact across damage/end-point categories of human health, ecosystem quality, climate change, and resources reduced by 8.7%, 3.8%, 13.2%, and 14.8% respectively for 15% co-firing ratio.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [J].
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Shirley, J. E. J. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :367-380
[2]  
Agency I.E, 2014, COAL MIN LOG EN TECH
[3]  
Agriculture T.D.O., 2010, TEX BIOEN 2010 STAT
[4]  
Akay A. E., 2004, Journal of Applied Sciences, V4, P100
[5]  
[Anonymous], US EN REL CARB DIOX
[6]   Life-Cycle Assessment of coal-biomass based electricity in Chile: Focus on using raw vs torrefied wood [J].
Arteaga-Perez, Luis E. ;
Vega, Mabel ;
Rodriguez, Lina C. ;
Flores, Mauricio ;
Zaror, Claudio A. ;
Casas Ledon, Yannay .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 29 :81-90
[7]  
Athanassiadis D., 1999, Journal of Forest Engineering, V10, P59
[8]   Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey [J].
Atilgan, Burcin ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 :555-564
[9]  
Baruya P., 2012, Losses in the coal supply chain
[10]  
Baumann H., 2004, HITCH HIKERS GUIDE L