What the public think about participation in medical research during an influenza pandemic: an international cross-sectional survey

被引:24
作者
Gobat, N. [1 ]
Butler, C. C. [1 ]
Mollison, J. [2 ]
Francis, N. A. [3 ]
Gal, M. [3 ]
Harris, V. [2 ]
Webb, S. A. R. [4 ]
Byrne, J. -P. [5 ]
Watkins, A. [3 ]
Sukumar, P. [5 ]
Hood, K. [6 ]
Nichol, A. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Clin Trials Unit, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Div Populat Med, Sch Med, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Trials Res, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[7] Univ Coll Dublin, HRB Funded Irish Crit Care Clin Trials Network, St Vincents Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Dublin, Ireland
[8] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Pandemic; Influenza; Clinical research; Preparedness; Public involvement; Informed consent; Research participation; INFORMED-CONSENT; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; CARE; VALIDATION; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2019.07.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The public and patients are primary contributors and beneficiaries of pandemic-relevant clinical research. However, their views on research participation during a pandemic have not been systematically studied. We aimed to understand public views regarding participation in clinical research during a hypothetical influenza pandemic. Study design: This is an international cross-sectional survey. Methods: We surveyed the views of nationally representative samples of people in Belgium, Poland, Spain, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, using a scenario-based instrument during the 2017 regional influenza season. Descriptive and regression analyses were conducted. Results: Of the 6804 respondents, 5572 (81.8%) thought pandemic-relevant research was important, and 5089 (74.8%) thought 'special rules' should be applied to make this research feasible. The respondents indicated willingness to take part in lower risk (4715, 69.3%) and higher risk (3585, 52.7%) primary care and lower risk (4780, 70.3%) and higher risk (4113, 60.4%) intensive care unit (ICU) study scenarios. For primary care studies, most (3972, 58.4%) participants preferred standard enrolment procedures such as prospective written informed consent, but 2327 (34.2%) thought simplified procedures would be acceptable. For ICU studies, 2800 (41.2%) preferred deferred consent, and 2623 (38.6%) preferred prospective third-party consent. Greater knowledge about pandemics, trust in a health professional, trust in the government, therapeutic misconception and having had ICU experience as a patient or carer predicted increased willingness to participate in pandemic-relevant research. Conclusions: Our study indicates current public support for pandemic-relevant clinical research. Tailored information and initiatives to advance research literacy and maintain trust are required to support pandemic-relevant research participation and engagement. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 94
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, COMP MACR CONT REG G
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NEGL DIM GLOB SEC FR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, International ethical guidelines for international ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans, DOI DOI 10.56759/RGXL7405
[4]   Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: Development and validation of a measure [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. ;
Anatchkova, Milena ;
Albert, Karen ;
Dunn, Laura B. ;
Lidz, Charles W. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 9 (06) :748-761
[5]   The Platform Trial An Efficient Strategy for Evaluating Multiple Treatments [J].
Berry, Scott M. ;
Connor, Jason T. ;
Lewis, Roger J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (16) :1619-1620
[6]   Participation of ICUs in Critical Care Pandemic Research: A Province Wide, Cross-Sectional Survey [J].
Burns, Karen E. A. ;
Rizvi, Leena ;
Tan, Wylie ;
Marshall, John C. ;
Pope, Karen .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (04) :1009-1016
[7]   A trial like ALIC(4)E: why design a platform, response-adaptive, open, randomised controlled trial of antivirals for influenza-like illness? [J].
Butler, Christopher C. ;
Coenen, Samuel ;
Saville, Benjamin R. ;
Cook, Johanna ;
van der Velden, Alike ;
Homes, Jane ;
de Jong, Menno ;
Little, Paul ;
Goossens, Herman ;
Beutels, Philippe ;
Ieven, Margareta ;
Francis, Nick ;
Moons, Pieter ;
Bongard, Emily ;
Verheij, Theo .
ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (02)
[8]   Better Tests, Better Care: Improved Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases [J].
Caliendo, Angela M. ;
Gilbert, David N. ;
Ginocchio, Christine C. ;
Hanson, Kimberly E. ;
May, Larissa ;
Quinn, Thomas C. ;
Tenover, Fred C. ;
Alland, David ;
Blaschke, Anne J. ;
Bonomo, Robert A. ;
Carroll, Karen C. ;
Ferraro, Mary Jane ;
Hirschhorn, Lisa R. ;
Joseph, W. Patrick ;
Karchmer, Tobi ;
MacIntyre, Ann T. ;
Reller, L. Barth ;
Jackson, Audrey F. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 57 :S139-S170
[9]   Reducing therapeutic misconception: A randomized intervention trial in hypothetical clinical trials [J].
Christopher, Paul P. ;
Appelbaum, Paul S. ;
Truong, Debbie ;
Albert, Karen ;
Maranda, Louise ;
Lidz, Charles .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09)
[10]  
Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future