Could probiotics be the panacea alternative to the use of antimicrobials in livestock diets?

被引:19
作者
Cameron, A. [1 ,2 ]
McAllister, T. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Vet Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, 5403 1st Ave South, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4P4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
direct-fed microbial; livestock; antibiotics; mycotoxins; microbiome; DIRECT-FED MICROBIALS; ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI; LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA; INTESTINAL BARRIER FUNCTION; BOVINE RESPIRATORY-DISEASE; VOLATILE FATTY-ACIDS; GUT-BRAIN AXIS; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; LACTOCOCCUS-LACTIS;
D O I
10.3920/BM2019.0059
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Probiotics are most frequently derived from the natural microbiota of healthy animals. These bacteria and their metabolic products are viewed as nutritional tools for promoting animal health and productivity, disease prevention and therapy, and food safety in an era defined by increasingly widespread antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens. In contemporary livestock production, antimicrobial usage is indispensable for animal welfare, and employed to enhance growth and feed efficiency. Given the importance of antimicrobials in both human and veterinary medicine, their effective replacement with direct-fed microbials or probiotics could help reduce antimicrobial use, perhaps restoring or extending the usefulness of these precious drugs against serious infections. Thus, probiotic research in livestock is rapidly evolving, aspiring to produce local and systemic health benefits on par with antimicrobials. Although many studies have clearly demonstrated the potential of probiotics to positively affect animal health and inhibit pathogens, experimental evidence suggests that probiotics' successes are modest, conditional, strain-dependent, and transient. Here, we explore current understanding, trends, and emerging applications of probiotic research and usage in major livestock species, and highlight successes in animal health and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 799
页数:27
相关论文
共 228 条
[1]   Comparison of single- and multi-strain probiotics effects on broiler breeder performance, egg production, egg quality and hatchability [J].
Aalaei, M. ;
Khatibjoo, A. ;
Zaghari, M. ;
Taherpour, K. ;
Gharaei, M. Akbari ;
Soltani, M. .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (05) :531-538
[2]   Review on microbial degradation of aflatoxins [J].
Adebo, O. A. ;
Njobeh, P. B. ;
Gbashi, S. ;
Nwinyi, O. C. ;
Mavumengwana, V. .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2017, 57 (15) :3208-3217
[3]   Bile-Salt-Hydrolases from the Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 Mediate Anti-giardial Activity in Vitro and in Vivo [J].
Allain, Thibault ;
Chaouch, Soraya ;
Thomas, Myriam ;
Vallee, Isabelle ;
Buret, Andre G. ;
Langella, Philippe ;
Grellier, Philippe ;
Polack, Bruno ;
Bermudez-Humaran, Luis G. ;
Florent, Isabelle .
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 8
[4]   The Intestinal Epithelium: Central Coordinator of Mucosal Immunity [J].
Allaire, Joannie M. ;
Crowley, Shauna M. ;
Law, Hong T. ;
Chang, Sun-Young ;
Ko, Hyun-Jeong ;
Vallance, Bruce A. .
TRENDS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 39 (09) :677-696
[5]   Combined effects of chitosan and microencapsulated Enterococcus faecalis CG1.0007 probiotic supplementation on performance and diarrhea incidences in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88+ challenged piglets [J].
Aluko, Kolawole ;
Velayudhan, Deepak E. ;
Khafipour, Ehsan ;
Li, Aike ;
Yin, Yulong ;
Nyachoti, Martin .
ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2017, 3 (04) :366-371
[6]   Antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial probiotic products used in cattle and swine [J].
Amachawadi, Raghavendra G. ;
Giok, Felicia ;
Shi, Xiaorong ;
Soto, Jose ;
Narayanan, Sanjeev K. ;
Tokach, Mike D. ;
Apley, Mike D. ;
Nagaraja, T. G. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (03) :912-920
[7]   Probiotic bacteria inhibit the bovine respiratory pathogen Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 invitro [J].
Amat, S. ;
Subramanian, S. ;
Timsit, E. ;
Alexander, T. W. .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 64 (05) :343-349
[8]   MEPs vote to ban prophylactic use of antibiotics in animals [J].
不详 .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2016, 178 (09) :201-202
[9]  
Arruda PHE, 2016, CAN VET J, V57, P183
[10]   Lactococcus lactis V7 inhibits the cell invasion of bovine mammary epithelial cells by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Assis, B. Seridan ;
Germon, P. ;
Silva, A. M. ;
Even, S. ;
Nicoli, J. R. ;
Le Loir, Y. .
BENEFICIAL MICROBES, 2015, 6 (06) :879-886