Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants

被引:611
|
作者
Ashraf, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Bot, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
关键词
ion uptake; photosynthesis; physiological indicators; salinity stress; salinity tolerance; water relations;
D O I
10.1078/0367-2530-00165
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Undoubtedly, plant breeders have made a significant achievement in the past few years, improving salinity tolerance in a number of potential crops using artificial selection and conventional breeding approaches, although molecular biology approaches are currently being intensively pursued for achieving this goal. However, most of the selection procedures used so far, were based merely on differences in agronomic characters. Agronomic characters represent the combined genetic and environmental effects on plant growth, and include the integration of the physiological phenomena conferring salinity tolerance. In fact, physiological criteria are able to supply more reliable information than agronomic characters. Although there are large numbers of reports in the literature mainly dealing with water relations, photosynthesis, and accumulation of various inorganic ions and organic metabolites in individual crops, there is little information available on the use of these attributes as selection criteria for improving salt tolerance through selection and breeding programs. In this review, the major adaptive components of salt tolerance such as osmotic adjustment, photosynthesis, water relations and ion relations are reviewed. In view of the complexity of salt tolerance and its great variation at intra-specific and inter-specific levels, it is difficult to identify single criteria, which could be used as effective selection targets. Rather it is most meaningful if physiological and biochemical indicators for individual species are determined rather than generic indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 376
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Engineering salt tolerance in plants
    Apse, MP
    Blumwald, E
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 13 (02) : 146 - 150
  • [32] CALCIUM AND SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS
    SHEAR, CB
    SCIENCE, 1970, 167 (3923) : 1387 - &
  • [33] PHYSIOLOGICAL CRITERIA AND GENETIC SELECTION
    LAND, RB
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1981, 8 (03): : 203 - 213
  • [34] Evaluation of physiological characteristics as selection criteria for drought tolerance in maize inbred lines and their hybrids
    Dordas, Christos A.
    Papathanasiou, Fokion
    Lithourgidie, Anastasios
    Petrevska, Jovanka-Katarzyna
    Papadopoulos, Ioannis
    Pankou, Chrysanthi
    Gekas, Fotakis
    Ninou, Elissavet
    Mylonas, Ioannis
    Sistanis, Iossif
    Tzantarmae, Constantinos
    Kargiotidou, Anastasia
    Tokatlidie, Ioannis S.
    MAYDICA, 2018, 63 (02):
  • [35] Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants: Interplay of Molecular, Biochemical and Physiological Responses in Important Development Stages
    Oguz, Muhammet Cagri
    Aycan, Murat
    Oguz, Ezgi
    Poyraz, Irem
    Yildiz, Mustafa
    PHYSIOLOGIA, 2022, 2 (04): : 180 - 197
  • [36] SALT TOLERANCE OF 5 CALIFORNIA SALT MARSH PLANTS
    BARBOUR, MG
    DAVIS, CB
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1970, 84 (01): : 262 - &
  • [37] Physiological markers for salinity tolerance in plants
    Läuchli, A
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY AND IN VITRO BIOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, 36 : 517 - 520
  • [38] Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: An omic approach towards salt stress tolerance
    Arif, Yamshi
    Singh, Priyanka
    Siddiqui, Husna
    Bajguz, Andrzej
    Hayat, Shamsul
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 156 : 64 - 77
  • [39] Some agronomic and physiological aspects of salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium kirsutum L.)
    Qadir, M
    Shams, M
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1997, 179 (02): : 101 - 106
  • [40] Differential expression of physiological and biochemical characters of some Indian mangroves towards salt tolerance
    Nandy P.
    Dasgupta N.
    Das S.
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2009, 15 (2) : 151 - 160