Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study

被引:108
作者
Davey, Elizabeth [1 ]
d'Assuncao, Jefferson
Irwig, Les
Macaskill, Petra
Chan, Siew F.
Richards, Adele
Farnsworth, Annabelle
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Douglass Hanly Moir Pathol, Cytol Dept, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7609期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39219.645475.55
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the accuracy of liquid based cytology using the computerised Thin Prep Imager with that of manually read conventional cytology. Design Prospective study. Setting Pathology laboratory in Sydney, Australia. Participants 55 164 split sample pairs (liquid based sample collected after conventional sample from one collection) from consecutive samples of women choosing both types of cytology and whose specimens were examined between August 2004 and June 2005. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was accuracy of slides for detecting squamous lesions. Secondary outcomes were rate of unsatisfactory slides, distribution of squarrous cytological classifications, and accuracy of detecting glandular lesions. Results Fewer unsatisfactory slides were found for imager read cytology than for conventional cytology (1.8% v 3.1%; P<0.001). More slides were classified as abnormal by imager read cytology (7.4% v 6.0% overall and 2.8% v 2.2% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 1 or higher). Among 550 patients in whom imager read cytology was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or higher and conventional cytology was less severe than grade 1, 133 of 380 biopsy samples taken were high grade histology. Among 294 patients in whom imager read cytology was less severe than cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 and conventional cytology was grade I or higher, 62 of 210 biopsy samples taken were high grade histology. Imager read cytology therefore detected 71 more cases of high grade histology than did conventional cytology, resulting from 170 more biopsies. Similar results were found when one pathologist reread the slides, masked to cytology results. Conclusion The ThinPrep Imager detects 1.29 more cases of histological high grade squamous disease per 1000 women screened than conventional cytology, with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 as the threshold for referral to colposcopy. More imager read slides than conventional slides were satisfactory for examination and more contained low grade cytological abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LIQ BAS CYT CERV SCR
[2]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2005, CANC SER AUSTR I HLT, V31
[3]   Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy [J].
Bergeron, C ;
Bishop, J ;
Lemarie, A ;
Cas, F ;
Ayivi, J ;
Huynh, B ;
Barrasso, R .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2001, 45 (04) :519-524
[4]   Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System [J].
Biscotti, CV ;
Dawson, AE ;
Dziura, B ;
Galup, L ;
Darragh, T ;
Rahemtulla, A ;
Wills-Frank, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (02) :281-287
[5]   Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified [J].
Chock, C ;
Irwig, L ;
Berry, G ;
Glasziou, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (11) :1211-1217
[6]  
*COMM DEP HUM SERV, 1994, GUID MAN WOM SCREEN
[7]   Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review [J].
Davey, E ;
Barratt, A ;
Irwig, L ;
Chan, SF ;
Macaskill, P ;
Mannes, P ;
Saville, AM .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9505) :122-132
[8]  
DAVEY E, 2007, IN PRESS CERVICAL CY
[9]   Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix [J].
Dziura, B ;
Quinn, S ;
Richard, K .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2006, 50 (03) :309-311
[10]  
Ferris DG, 2000, J FAM PRACTICE, V49, P1005