Screening test recommendations for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance practices: A cost-minimization analysis

被引:2
作者
Whittington, Melanie D. [1 ,2 ]
Curtis, Donna J. [3 ]
Atherly, Adam J. [1 ]
Bradley, Cathy J. [1 ,4 ]
Lindrooth, Richard C. [1 ]
Campbell, Jonathan D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Hlth Syst Management & Policy, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Clin Pharm, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Canc Ctr, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Surveillance; Isolation; Infection control; Cost-effectiveness; HIGH-RISK; PCR; METAANALYSIS; INFECTION; ASSAY; MRSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2016.12.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: To mitigate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, intensive care units (ICUs) conduct surveillance through screening patients upon admission followed by adhering to isolation precautions. Two surveillance approaches commonly implemented are universal preemptive isolation and targeted isolation of only MRSA-positive patients. Methods: Decision analysis was used to calculate the total cost of universal preemptive isolation and targeted isolation. The screening test used as part of the surveillance practice was varied to identify which screening test minimized inappropriate and total costs. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the range of total costs resulting from variation in inputs. Results: The total cost of the universal preemptive isolation surveillance practice was minimized when a polymerase chain reaction screening test was used ($82.51 per patient). Costs were $207.60 more per patient when a conventional culture was used due to the longer turnaround time and thus higher isolation costs. The total cost of the targeted isolation surveillance practice was minimized when chromogenic agar 24-hour testing was used ($8.54 per patient). Costs were $22.41 more per patient when polymerase chain reaction was used. Conclusions: For ICUs that preemptively isolate all patients, the use of a polymerase chain reaction screening test is recommended because it can minimize total costs by reducing inappropriate isolation costs. For ICUs that only isolate MRSA-positive patients, the use of chromogenic agar 24-hour testing is recommended to minimize total costs. (C) 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 708
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, AHRQS EFFORTS PREVEN
  • [2] Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital
    Clancy, Megan
    Graepler, Amy
    Wilson, Michael
    Douglas, Ivor
    Johnson, Jeff
    Price, Connie Savor
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (10) : 1009 - 1017
  • [3] Collins Amy S, 2008, PATIENT SAFETY QUALI
  • [4] Targeted versus Universal Decolonization to Prevent ICU Infection
    Huang, Susan S.
    Septimus, Edward
    Kleinman, Ken
    Moody, Julia
    Hickok, Jason
    Avery, Taliser R.
    Lankiewicz, Julie
    Gombosev, Adrijana
    Terpstra, Leah
    Hartford, Fallon
    Hayden, Mary K.
    Jernigan, John A.
    Weinstein, Robert A.
    Fraser, Victoria J.
    Haffenreffer, Katherine
    Cui, Eric
    Kaganov, Rebecca E.
    Lolans, Karen
    Perlin, Jonathan B.
    Platt, Richard
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (24) : 2255 - 2265
  • [5] Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in US hospitals, 2002
    Klevens, R. Monina
    Edwards, Jonathan R.
    Richards, Chesley L., Jr.
    Horan, Teresa C.
    Gaynes, Robert P.
    Pollock, Daniel A.
    Cardo, Denise M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2007, 122 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [6] The economic value of screening haemodialysis patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the USA
    Lee, B. Y.
    Song, Y.
    McGlone, S. M.
    Bailey, R. R.
    Feura, J. M.
    Tai, J. H. Y.
    Lewis, G. J.
    Wiringa, A. E.
    Smith, K. J.
    Muder, R. R.
    Harrison, L. H.
    Piraino, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (11) : 1717 - 1726
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of supplementing a broth-enriched culture test with the Xpert meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay for screening inpatients at high risk of MRSA
    Li, J.
    Ulvin, K.
    Biboh, H.
    Kristiansen, I. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2012, 82 (04) : 227 - 233
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of culture-based and PCR-based detection tests for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis
    Luteijn, J. M.
    Hubben, G. A. A.
    Pechlivanoglou, P.
    Bonten, M. J.
    Postma, M. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (02) : 146 - 154
  • [9] Cost-Benefit Analysis from the Hospital Perspective of Universal Active Screening Followed by Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers
    McKinnell, James A.
    Bartsch, Sarah M.
    Lee, Bruce Y.
    Huang, Susan S.
    Miller, Loren G.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [10] Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systematic review
    Polisena, Julie
    Chen, Stella
    Cimon, Karen
    McGill, Sarah
    Forward, Kevin
    Gardam, Michael
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 11