Evaluating NISAR's cropland mapping algorithm over the conterminous United States using Sentinel-1 data

被引:11
作者
Rose, Shannon [1 ]
Kraatz, Simon [1 ]
Kellndorfer, Josef [2 ]
Cosh, Michael H. [3 ]
Torbick, Nathan [4 ]
Huang, Xiaodong [4 ]
Siqueira, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 113 Knowles Engn Bldg,151 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Earth Big Data LLC, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[4] Appl Geosolut, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
SAR; Coefficient of variation; Time series; Sentinel-1; Crop classification; Agriculture; POLARIMETRIC SAR; LAND; CLASSIFICATION; MODIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2021.112472
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate knowledge of the distribution, breadth and change in agricultural activity is important to food security and the related trade and policy mechanisms. Routine observations afforded by spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) allows for high-fidelity monitoring of agricultural parameters at the field scale. Here we evaluate the approach to be used for generating NASA's upcoming NASA ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission's L-band cropland product using Sentinel-1C-band data. This study uses all ascending Sentinel-1A/B data collected over the conterminous United States in 2017 to compute the coefficient of variation (CV) at 150 m x 150 m resolution and evaluates the overall accuracy (OA) of CV-based crop/non-crop classifications at 100 one-by-one degree tiles. We calculate accuracies using two approaches: (a) using a literature-recommended constant CV threshold of 0.5 (CVthr_0.5) and (b) determining optimal CV thresholds for every tile using Youden's J statistic (YJS), CVthr_YJS. These accuracy comparisons are important for determining (1) the viability of using a computationally inexpensive and straightforward approach for cropland classification over large spatial scales/diverse land covers (i. e., can accuracies >= 80% be routinely achieved?), (2) how closely OA0.5 compares to the performance ceiling (OAYJS). This information will help determine whether approach (a) is appropriate and how much potential room of improvement there could be in modifying it. Results for OA0.5 and OAYJS are 81.5% and 86.8%, respectively. A breakdown by census geographic region, showed that OA0.5 (OAYJS) exceeded 80% (90%) in the South and Midwest, but was only 76.1% (73.5%) in the West. The improvement in OAYJS mainly stems from tiles with >40% crop prevalence having about 10% greater OA values. To better examine the potential of the approach for land cover classification, results of approach (b) were also stratified by crop. Approach (b) accurately detected most non-crop classes as non-crop (>80%), but with low OAYJS values for grasslands/pasture, especially in the West. CV values for crop were distinct from non-crop indicating that the approach is suitable for crop/non-crop classifications. Because results CV values have substantial overlap within crop/non-crop classes, indicating the approach is poorly suited for land cover classifications. We also detected a strong geographic dependence of CVthr_YJS: values ranged from about 0.2 at the coasts and gradually increase to about 0.6 in the Central United States, most often falling close to 0.3 and 0.5.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   LAND COVER MAPPING USING SENTINEL-1 SAR DATA [J].
Abdikan, S. ;
Sanli, F. B. ;
Ustuner, M. ;
Calo, F. .
XXIII ISPRS CONGRESS, COMMISSION VII, 2016, 41 (B7) :757-761
[2]  
Anderson J.R., 1976, A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, P ESA SP 461 ERS ENV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ICML
[5]   Crop Classification Based on Temporal Signatures of Sentinel-1 Observations over Navarre Province, Spain [J].
Arias, Maria ;
Angel Campo-Bescos, Miguel ;
Alvarez-Mozos, Jesus .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (02)
[6]   The GEOGLAM crop monitor for AMIS: Assessing crop conditions in the context of global markets [J].
Becker-Reshef, Inbal ;
Barker, Brian ;
Humber, Michael ;
Puricelli, Estefania ;
Sanchez, Antonio ;
Sahajpal, Ritvik ;
McGaughey, Katie ;
Justice, Christopher ;
Baruth, Bettina ;
Wu, Bingfang ;
Prakash, Adam ;
Abdolreza, Abbassian ;
Jarvis, Ian .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 23 :173-181
[7]   Sentinel-2 cropland mapping using pixel-based and object-based time-weighted dynamic time warping analysis [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Csillik, Ovidiu .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 204 :509-523
[8]  
Bigelow D., 2017, MAJOR USES LAND US, P2012
[9]   Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program [J].
Boryan, Claire ;
Yang, Zhengwei ;
Mueller, Rick ;
Craig, Mike .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 26 (05) :341-358
[10]  
Bureau U.S.C, 2010, CENS REG DIV US