A comparison of seasonal influenza and novel Covid-19 vaccine intentions: A cross-sectional survey of vaccine hesitant adults in England during the 2020 pandemic

被引:19
|
作者
Antonopoulou, Vivi [1 ]
Goffe, Louis [2 ]
Meyer, Carly J. [1 ]
Grimani, Aikaterini [3 ]
Graham, Fiona [2 ]
Lecouturier, Jan [2 ]
Tang, Mei Yee [2 ]
Chadwick, Paul [1 ]
Sniehotta, Falko F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, London, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Behav Sci Grp, NIHR Policy Res Unit Behav Sci, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Prevent Med & Digital Hlth Baden Wuerttemberg, Dept Publ Hlth Prevent & Social Med, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Pandemic; vaccine uptake; behavioral models; vaccination; Theory of Planned Behavior; Health Belief Model; HEALTH BELIEF MODEL; ACCEPTANCE; BARRIERS; BEHAVIOR; EFFICACY; TRENDS; NURSES; FLU;
D O I
10.1080/21645515.2022.2085461
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We compared intention to receive the seasonal influenza vaccine with a prospective coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine among undecided or COVID-19 vaccine hesitant individuals to better understand the underlying differences and similarities in factors associated with vaccine intention. We delivered a cross-sectional online survey in October-November 2020. We included psychological constructs and sociodemographic variables informed by theory. We conducted pairwise comparisons and multiple linear regression models to explore associations between vaccine intention and psychological constructs. We recruited 1,660 participants, where 47.6% responded that they would likely receive the influenza vaccine, 31.0% that they would probably not accept the vaccination and 21.4% were unsure. In relation to the prospective COVID-19 vaccine, 39.0% responded that they would likely receive the vaccination, 23.7% that they would probably not accept the vaccination and 37.3% were unsure. Unique factors positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine intention were: perceived knowledge sufficiency about vaccine safety, beliefs about vaccine safety, and living in an area of low deprivation. The only unique factor positively associated with influenza intention was past influenza behavior. The strongest common predictors positively associated with intention were: favorable vaccine attitudes, the anticipated regret they may feel following infection if they were not to receive a vaccine, and the expectation from family or friends to accept the vaccine. Despite overall similarities in those factors associated with vaccination intention, we identified unique influences on intention. This additional insight will help support the planning and tailoring of future immunizations programmes for the respective viruses.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy During the Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
    Veys-Takeuchi, Caroline
    Nussle, Semira Gonseth
    Estoppey, Sandrine
    Zuppinger, Claire
    Dupraz, Julien
    Pasquier, Jerome
    Faivre, Vincent
    Scuderi, Renzo
    Vassaux, Sophie
    Bochud, Murielle
    D'Acremont, Valerie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 67
  • [2] Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to determine the intentions to receive the influenza vaccine during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey of US adults
    Chu, Angela
    Gupta, Vasudha
    Unni, Elizabeth J.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 23
  • [3] Parental Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy and Associated Factors in Shanghai, China, during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Fan, Jingyi
    Ye, Chuchu
    Wang, Yuanping
    Qi, Hui
    Li, Dong
    Mao, Jun
    Xu, Hongmei
    Shi, Xiaojin
    Zhu, Weiping
    Zhou, Yixin
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [4] Novel Psychosocial Correlates of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Cross-Sectional Survey
    Bacon, Elizabeth
    An, Lawrence
    Yang, Penny
    Hawley, Sarah
    Van Horn, M. Lee
    Resnicow, Ken
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [5] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic; a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
    Terry, Emily
    Cartledge, Sapphire
    Damery, Sarah
    Greenfield, Sheila
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic; a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
    Emily Terry
    Sapphire Cartledge
    Sarah Damery
    Sheila Greenfield
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [7] COVID-19 vaccine uptake among physicians during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: Attitude, intentions, and determinants: A cross-sectional study
    Amer, Samar A.
    Shah, Jaffer
    Abd-Ellatif, Eman Elsayed
    El Maghawry, Hala A.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [8] Assessing licensed nurses COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and intentions: a cross-sectional survey in the state of Hawaii
    Fontenot, Holly B.
    Mattheus, Deborah
    Lim, Eunjung
    Michel, Alexandra
    Ryan, Nicole
    Davis, Katherine Finn
    Zimet, Gregory
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (11) : 3933 - 3940
  • [9] Parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a cross-sectional survey in Italy
    Bianco, Aida
    Della Polla, Giorgia
    Angelillo, Silvia
    Pelullo, Concetta P.
    Licata, Francesca
    Angelillo, Italo F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (04) : 541 - 547
  • [10] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional survey
    Uhr, Lauren
    Mateen, Farrah J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (07) : 1072 - 1080