Benefits of and Barriers to Using Patient-Rated Outcome Measures in Athletic Training

被引:51
作者
Valier, Alison R. Snyder [1 ]
Jennings, Amy L.
Parsons, John T. [2 ]
Vela, Luzita I. [3 ]
机构
[1] AT Still Univ, Arizona Sch Hlth Sci, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA
[2] Natl Collegiate Athlet Assoc, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Texas State Univ, San Marcos, TX USA
关键词
standardized data collection; health-related quality of life; patient based; patient oriented; patient reported; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; HEALTH; CLINICIAN; INJURY; FACILITATORS; PAIN;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.15
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) are important for driving treatment decisions and determining treatment effectiveness. However, athletic trainers (ATs) rarely use them; understanding why may facilitate strategies for collection of these outcomes. Objective: To identify the benefits of and barriers to using PROMs in athletic training. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 1469 randomly sampled ATs (age = 36.8 +/- 9.8 years; 48% female) working in the college/university, 2-year institution, secondary school, clinic, hospital, or industrial/occupational setting. Intervention(s): An e-mail was sent to ATs inviting them to complete a survey regarding the use, benefits, and barriers of PROMs. Athletic trainers who indicated they used PROMs (AT-PRs) completed 65 questions about the benefits of and barriers to their use. Athletic trainers who indicated no use of PROMs (AT-NONs) completed 21 questions about barriers of use. Main Outcome Measure(s): Dependent variables were the endorsements for the benefits of and barriers to the use of PROMs. Results: A total of 458 ATs initiated the survey and 421 (AT-PR = 26%, AT-NON = 74%) completed it (response rate = 28.7%). The most frequently endorsed benefits by AT-PRs were enhancing communication with patients (90%) and other health care professionals (80%), directing patient care (87%), and increasing examination efficiency (80%). The most frequently endorsed barriers by AT-PRs were that PROMs are time consuming (44%), difficult (36%), and confusing (31%) for patients and time consuming for clinicians to score and interpret (29%). The most frequently endorsed problems by AT-NONs were that PROMs are time consuming for clinicians to score and interpret (31%), time consuming (46%) and irrelevant to patients (28%), and lacking a support structure for clinicians (29%). Conclusions: These results suggest that, although benefits to using PROMs exist, there are also barriers. Barriers are similar for AT-PRs and AT-NONs. Strategies to decrease barriers and facilitate the use of PROMs warrant investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 683
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy [J].
Abrams, D ;
Davidson, M ;
Harrick, J ;
Harcourt, P ;
Zylinski, M ;
Clancy, J .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) :46-53
[2]  
Albohm M., 1999, J REHABILITATION OUT, P51
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Survey research methods
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, National Priorities for Research and Research Agenda
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HLTH PROFESSIONS ED
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
[8]  
[Anonymous], WHAT IS COMP EFF RES
[9]  
Australian Council of Physiotherapy Regulating Authorities, 2002, AUSTR PHYS COMP STAN
[10]   Factors Influencing the Use of Outcome Measures for Patients With Low Back Pain: A Survey of New Zealand Physical Therapists [J].
Copeland, Janet M. ;
Taylor, William J. ;
Dean, Sarah G. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 88 (12) :1492-1505