A stakeholders' participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways

被引:21
作者
Ahmad, Salman [1 ]
Ouenniche, Jamal [2 ]
Kolosz, Ben W. [3 ,4 ]
Greening, Philip [1 ]
Andresen, John M. [3 ]
Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes [3 ]
Xu, Bing [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Edinburgh Business Sch, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Business Sch, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Heriot Watt Univ, Res Ctr Carbon Solut RCCS, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF); Sustainability; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; VIKOR; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ALTERNATIVE JET FUEL; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSIS; BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; POLICIES; CRITERIA; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108156
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) provide a viable option to decarbonise global aviation. Unlike conventional jetfuel, SAFs can be produced in several production pathways making their selection a complex multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with conflicting objectives. In this paper, we propose a multicriteria based framework for evaluating SAF production pathways, which is a sequential decision-making process with feedback adjustment mechanisms. Given the early stage of SAF technologies' development and the scarcity of data on such technologies, in this research, we involved a variety of aviation industry stakeholders to assist with data and preference gathering. Our MCDM framework is designed to be generic to provide flexibilities to potential users in choosing the appropriate implementation decisions for the relevant stakeholders. The strength of the proposed framework lays in its flexibility to accommodate various stakeholders' subjective judgements, choice of ranking method, and robustness of results. We used our MCDM framework within a stakeholders' participatory approach to rank order 11 SAF production pathways against 24 criteria grouped under social, environmental, economic, and technical impact categories. Our analysis revealed that the environmental and the economic impact categories are the most important ones followed by the technical and the social criteria; the gasification/FischerTropsch (F-T) based production processes are preferred over fermentation and oil-based ones; and waste gases are the preferred feedstock along with wood-residue. These findings provide decision-makers with guidelines on the selection of SAF production pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Life Cycle Assessment of Potential Biojet Fuel Production in the United States [J].
Agusdinata, Datu B. ;
Zhao, Fu ;
Ileleji, Klein ;
DeLaurentis, Dan .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (21) :9133-9143
[2]   Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable and nuclear resources for. electricity generation in Kazakhstan [J].
Ahmad, Salman ;
Nadeem, Abid ;
Akhanova, Gulzhanat ;
Houghton, Tom ;
Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus .
ENERGY, 2017, 141 :1880-1891
[3]   Determinants of stakeholders' attitudes towards biodiesel [J].
Amin, Latifah ;
Hashim, Hasrizul ;
Mahadi, Zurina ;
Ibrahim, Maznah ;
Ismail, Khaidzir .
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INNOVATION OUTLOOK A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Sustainable Aviation Fuels Fact sheet
[6]   Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison [J].
Atsonios, Konstantinos ;
Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander ;
Panopoulos, Kyriakos D. ;
Kakaras, Emmanuel .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :346-366
[7]   Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Govindan, Kannan ;
Gold, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 195 :106-117
[8]   A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Goyal, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) :370-378
[9]   Jatropha cultivation in southern India: assessing farmers' experiences [J].
Axelsson, Lisa ;
Franzen, Maria ;
Ostwald, Madelene ;
Berndes, Goran ;
Lakshmi, G. ;
Ravindranath, N. H. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (03) :246-256
[10]   The costs of production of alternative jet fuel: A harmonized stochastic assessment [J].
Bann, Seamus J. ;
Malina, Robert ;
Staples, Mark D. ;
Suresh, Pooja ;
Pearlson, Matthew ;
Tyner, Wallace E. ;
Hileman, James I. ;
Barrett, Steven .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 227 :179-187