Dropout rates of in-person psychosocial substance use disorder treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:252
作者
Lappan, Sara N. [1 ]
Brown, Andrew W. [2 ]
Hendricks, Peter S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Hlth Behav, Birmingham Sch Publ Hlth, 1665 Univ Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Addiction; attrition; dropout; meta-analysis; retention; substance dependence; substance use disorder; treatment; ABUSE TREATMENT; TREATMENT RETENTION; CULTURAL SENSITIVITY; THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE; ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; DRUG; ALCOHOL; PREDICTORS; CLIENT;
D O I
10.1111/add.14793
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims Relapse rates for psychosocial substance use disorder (SUD) treatments are high, and dropout is a robust predictor of relapse. This study aimed to estimate average dropout rates of in-person psychosocial SUD treatments and to assess predictors of dropout. Design A comprehensive meta-analysis of dropout rates of studies of in-person psychosocial SUD treatment. Studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Setting Studies conducted anywhere in the world that examined SUD treatment and were published from 1965 to 2016, inclusive. Participants/cases One hundred and fifty-one studies, 338 study arms and 299 dropout rates including 26 243 participants. Measurements Databases were searched for studies of SUD treatment that included an in-person psychosocial component. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to estimate dropout rates and identify predictors of dropout, including participant characteristics, facilitator characteristics and treatment characteristics. Pooled estimates were calculated with random-effects analyses accounting for the hierarchical structure of study arms nested within studies. Findings The average dropout rate across all studies and study arms was 30.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 27.2-33.8 and 95% prediction interval (PI) = 6.25-74.15], with substantial heterogeneity (I-2 = 93.7%, P < 0.0001). Studies including a higher percentage of African Americans and lower-income individuals were associated with higher dropout rates. At intake, more cigarettes/day and a greater percentage of heroin use days were associated with lower dropout rates, whereas heavier cocaine use was associated with higher dropout rates. Dropout rates were highest for studies targeting cocaine, methamphetamines and major stimulants (broadly defined) and lowest for studies targeting alcohol, tobacco and heroin, although there were few studies on methamphetamines, major stimulants and heroin. Programs characterized by more treatment sessions and greater average session length were associated with higher dropout rates. Facilitator characteristics were not significantly associated with dropout. Conclusions On average, approximately 30% of participants drop out of in-person psychosocial SUD treatment studies, but there is wide variability. Drop-out rates vary with the treated population, the substance being targeted, and the characteristics of the treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 217
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NIH PUBLICATION
[2]   ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY AND CULTURAL SENSITIVITY FOR OUTCOME RESEARCH - ISSUES FOR THE CULTURAL-ADAPTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENTS WITH HISPANICS [J].
BERNAL, G ;
BONILLA, J ;
BELLIDO, C .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 23 (01) :67-82
[3]   Does being drunk or high cause HIV sexual risk behavior? A systematic review of drug administration studies [J].
Berry, Meredith S. ;
Johnson, Matthew W. .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 164 :125-138
[4]   Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Miller, Michelle L. ;
Yi, Richard ;
Kowal, Benjamin P. ;
Lindquist, Diana M. ;
Pitcock, Jeffery A. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2007, 90 :S85-S91
[5]   Relapse and relapse prevention [J].
Brandon, Thomas H. ;
Vidrine, Jennifer Irvin ;
Litvin, Erika B. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 3 :257-284
[6]   Drop-out from addiction treatment: A systematic review of risk factors [J].
Brorson, Hanne H. ;
Arnevik, Espen Ajo ;
Rand-Hendriksen, Kim ;
Duckert, Fanny .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (08) :1010-1024
[7]   Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions [J].
Brown, Andrew W. ;
Kaiser, Kathryn A. ;
Allison, David B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (11) :2563-2570
[8]   CHANGES IN DEPRESSION AMONG ABSTINENT ALCOHOLICS [J].
BROWN, SA ;
SCHUCKIT, MA .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1988, 49 (05) :412-417
[9]   Dopaminergic Network Differences in Human Impulsivity [J].
Buckholtz, Joshua W. ;
Treadway, Michael T. ;
Cowan, Ronald L. ;
Woodward, Neil D. ;
Li, Rui ;
Ansari, M. Sib ;
Baldwin, Ronald M. ;
Schwartzman, Ashley N. ;
Shelby, Evan S. ;
Smith, Clarence E. ;
Kessler, Robert M. ;
Zald, David H. .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5991) :532-532
[10]   Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials The CONSORT PRO Extension [J].
Calvert, Melanie ;
Blazeby, Jane ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Moher, David ;
Brundage, Michael D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (08) :814-822