Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of uveal melanoma

被引:20
作者
Zeng, Qiaozhu [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Yuou [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Mingwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Eye Dis & Optometry Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen South St, Beijing, Xicheng Distric, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Beijing Key Lab Diag & Therapy Retinal & Choroid, Coll Optometry, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Uveal melanoma; SEER; Cancer-specific survival; Nomogram; ENUCLEATION; PROGNOSIS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-021-01968-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare but aggressive cancer, which is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. We aimed to develop and validate a competing risk nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with UM, as well as compare its prognostic value with that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Methods Data of patients diagnosed with UM from 2010 to 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We extracted and integrated significant prognostic factors based on competing risk regression to build a nomogram. The nomogram with an online prediction version was also created. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was carried out to estimate clinical applicability of the model. Improvements in the predictive accuracy of our new model compared with AJCC staging system were estimated by calculating the relative integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and the net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results A total of 839 eligible patients with primary UM were randomly assigned to a training cohort (588, 70%) and a validation cohort (251, 30%). Age, histological type, T stage and M stage were independent prognostic factors to predict CSS of UM and were incorporated in the nomogram. The calibration plots indicated that the 3- and 5-year CSS probabilities were consistent between the nomogram prediction and the actual observation. The C-index for this model was 0.778 (95% CI:0.756-0.800) and 0.786 (95% CI: 0.749-0.816) in the training cohort and validation cohort. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.814, 0.771, and 0.792 in the training cohort, 0.788, 0.781 and 0.804 in the validation cohort, respectively. The NRI value in AJCC staging system was - 0.153 (95% CI -0.29 - - 0.041) for 3 years of follow-up and - 0.276 (95% CI -0.415 - - 0.132) for 5 years of follow-up. The IDI values for 3 and 5 years of follow-up in the AJCC staging system were - 0.021 (P = 0.076) and - 0.045 (P = 0.004), respectively. Conclusions We have developed and validated a competing risk nomogram to reliably predict cancer-specific survival of patients with UM. This convenient tool may be useful for evaluating cancer-specific prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1973-2013)
    Aronow, Mary E.
    Topham, Allan K.
    Singh, Arun D.
    [J]. OCULAR ONCOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY, 2018, 4 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [2] Bergman L, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P2579
  • [3] Survival from uveal melanoma in England and Wales 1986 to 2001
    Burr, J. M.
    Mitry, E.
    Rachet, B.
    Coleman, M. P.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [4] Chang AE, 1998, CANCER, V83, P1664, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981015)83:8<1664::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-G
  • [6] Uveal melanoma: From diagnosis to treatment and the science in between
    Chattopadhyay, Chandrani
    Kim, Dae Won
    Gombos, Dan S.
    Oba, Junna
    Qin, Yong
    Williams, Michelle D.
    Esmaeli, Bita
    Grimm, Elizabeth A.
    Wargo, Jennifer A.
    Woodman, Scott E.
    Patel, Sapna P.
    [J]. CANCER, 2016, 122 (15) : 2299 - 2312
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOLLOWING ENUCLEATION OF 111 UVEAL MELANOMAS
    COLEMAN, K
    BAAK, JPA
    VANDIEST, P
    MULLANEY, J
    FARRELL, M
    FENTON, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 77 (11) : 688 - 692
  • [8] Cook NR, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P191, DOI 10.1002/sim.2987
  • [9] The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 1471 - 1474
  • [10] Fine J P, 2001, Biostatistics, V2, P85, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/2.1.85