Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)

被引:5
|
作者
Le Bonniec, Alice [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gourlan, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
Preau, Marie [3 ]
Cousson-Gelie, Florence [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Epsylon EA4556, Montpellier, France
[2] Montpellier Canc Inst, Prevent Dept, Epidaure, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Lumiere Lyon 2, Res Grp Social Psychol GRePS, EA4163, Lyon, France
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Intention-behavior gap; Planning; Screening; Theory of planned behavior; PROTECTION MOTIVATION THEORY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12529-021-09976-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background Most of the individuals concerned by colorectal cancer screening recognize the importance of screening participation. However, the screening rates for this cancer remain low in most countries, including France. Based on the action control framework, the present study aimed to (i) explore the distribution of intentions-behavior profiles toward colorectal cancer screening and (ii) to determine to what extent the profiles could be differentiated on theory of planned behavior (TPB) (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control [PBC]) and self-regulation variables (i.e., action planning, coping planning). Method A total of 149 participants from the general French population (M = 60 years, SD = 7.04) completed a questionnaire measuring TPB and self-regulation variables. Subsequent screening behavior was determined from medical records. Participants were notably categorized as non-intenders, unsuccessful intenders, or successful intenders. Data were analyzed using discriminant function analysis and analyses of covariance. Results Main findings revealed that 71% of the intenders were unsuccessful intenders. TPB and self-regulation variables were significantly correlated with the discriminant function (rs >= .40). Successful and unsuccessful intenders reported significantly higher levels of subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning than non-intenders (ps < .01). Successful intenders reported a significantly higher level of coping planning than unsuccessful intenders (p < .01). Conclusions Further research appears necessary to empirically test to what extent interventions targeting subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning could enhance the proportion of successful intenders toward colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
    Alice Le Bonniec
    Mathieu Gourlan
    Marie Préau
    Florence Cousson-Gélie
    International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2022, 29 : 122 - 130
  • [2] Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan and France: Does the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Fit?
    Braillon, Alain
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (24) : 4441 - 4442
  • [3] A Stable and Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening
    Clampett, Daniel
    Quindere, Josie
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S601 - S601
  • [4] Reply to Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan and France: Does the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Fit?
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (24) : 4442 - 4443
  • [5] Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening: 4 Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Based Screening
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    Grobbee, Esmee J.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Spaander, Manon
    Dekker, Evelien
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S755 - S755
  • [6] Reliability of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) in Colorectal Cancer Screening at High Ambient Temperature
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Lee, Joung Il
    Joo, Kwang Ro
    Shin, Hyun Phil
    Park, Jae Jun
    Jeun, Jung Won
    Lim, Jun U. K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 411 - 412
  • [7] Results of Compliant Participation in Five Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer
    Baldacchini, Flavia
    Bucchi, Lauro
    Giuliani, Orietta
    Mancini, Silvia
    Ravaioli, Alessandra
    Vattiato, Rosa
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Campari, Cinzia
    Canuti, Debora
    Di Felice, Enza
    Mezzetti, Francesca
    de Bianchi, Priscilla Sassoli
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Falcini, Fabio
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (11) : 2361 - 2369
  • [8] Colorectal Cancer Screening: Fecal immunochemical Test or Sigmoidoscopy?
    Hofmann-Assmus, Marion
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2021, 59 (07): : 626 - 628
  • [9] 'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening
    Loi, Claudia X. Aguado
    Tyson, Dinorah Martinez
    Chavarria, Enmanuel A.
    Gutierrez, Liliana
    Klasko, Lynne
    Davis, Stacy
    Lopez, Diana
    Johns, Tracy
    Meade, Cathy D.
    Gwede, Clement K.
    ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2020, 25 (02) : 206 - 221
  • [10] Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT): third round
    Stegeman, Inge
    de Wijkerslooth, Thomas R.
    Mallant-Hent, Rosalie C.
    de Groot, Karin
    Stroobants, An K.
    Fockens, Paul
    Mundt, Marco
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Dekker, Evelien
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 12