Sustainable Development Goals: a change in scientific debate on development?

被引：0
作者：
Cia Alves, Elia Elisa [1 ]
de Almeida Lopes Fernandes, Ivan Filipe [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Relacoes Int, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed ABC, Ctr Engn Modelagem & Ciencias Socials Aplicadas, Sao Bernardo Do Campo, SP, Brazil
来源：
MERIDIANO 47-JOURNAL OF GLOBAL STUDIES | 2020年 / 21卷
关键词：
Economic Development Studies; Sustainable Development; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
D O I：
10.20889/M47e21010
中图分类号：
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号：
030207 ;
摘要：
How did environmental sustainability permeate the political-academic debate on development and which themes are still under discussion within the scope of sustainable development objectives (SDGs)? From an interdisciplinary literature review, this work presents a trajectory of development studies, culminating in the SDGs. From a technical and one-dimensional perspective, from a post-Cold War window of opportunity, the debate moved towards a multidimensional and transversal approach, involving the social and environmental spheres. However, critics question whether the SDGs represent a legitimate and implementable agenda, considering all setbacks in international and domestic policies.
引用
收藏
页数：17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Adams Barbara, 2015, PRIVATE FUNDING CORP, V27
[2]  
Amin Samir., 2006, TRANSFORMING REVOLUT
[3]  
Amin Samir., 1976, Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1966, MON REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Sustainable Development Goal 6: synthesis report 2018 on water and sanitation
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1972, LIMITS GROWTH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1063/1.3159605
[8]   Sustainability and Development [J].
Barbier, Edward B. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 8, 2016, 8 :261-280
[9]  
Barnett H., 1963, SCARCITY AND GROWTH
[10]  
Boulding K.E., 1966, EC ECOLOGY ETHICS ES
1234567