Electrocautery of the patellar rim in primary total knee replacement: beneficial or unnecessary?

被引:25
作者
Gupta, S. [1 ]
Augustine, A. [1 ]
Horey, L. [1 ]
Meek, R. M. D. [1 ]
Hullin, M. G. [1 ]
Mohammed, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] So Gen Hosp, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2010年 / 92B卷 / 09期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; ARTHROPLASTY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24467
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The management of the patella during total knee replacement is controversial. In some studies the absence of patellar resurfacing results in residual anterior knee pain in over 10% of patients. One form of treatment which may be used in an endeavour to reduce this is circumferential patellar rim electrocautery. This is believed to partially denervate the patella. However, there is no evidence of the efficacy of this procedure, nor do we know if it results in harm. A retrospective comparative cohort study was performed of 192 patients who had undergone a primary total knee replacement with the porous coated Low Contact Stress rotating platform prosthesis without patellar resurfacing between 2003 and 2007. In 98 patients circumferential electrocautery of the patellar rim was performed and in 94 patients it was not. The two groups were matched for gender and age. The general Oxford Knee Score and the more specific patellar score for anterior knee pain were used to assess patient outcomes a minimum of two years post-operatively. No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups for either scoring system (p = 0.41 and p = 0.87, respectively). Electrocautery of the patella rim did not improve the outcome scores after primary total knee replacement in our patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1261
页数:3
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty - A prospective, randomized, double-blind study [J].
Barrack, RL ;
Wolfe, MW ;
Waldman, DA ;
Milicic, M ;
Bertot, AJ ;
Myers, L .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (08) :1121-1131
[2]   Patellar Resurfacing Compared with Nonresurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty A Concise Follow-up of a Randomized Trial [J].
Burnett, R. Stephen J. ;
Boone, Julienne L. ;
Rosenzweig, Seth D. ;
Steger-May, Karen ;
Barrack, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (11) :2562-2567
[3]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Murray, D ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (01) :63-69
[4]   Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Feller, JA ;
Bartlett, RJ ;
Lang, DM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (02) :226-228
[5]   The role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Holt, GE ;
Dennis, DA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (416) :76-83
[6]   Secondary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty - Results of multivariate analysis in two case-matched groups [J].
Karnezis, IA ;
Vossinakis, IC ;
Rex, C ;
Fragkiadakis, EG ;
Newman, JH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (08) :993-998
[7]   Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test [J].
Kleijn, Lucas L. A. ;
van Hemert, Wouter L. W. ;
Meijers, Will G. H. ;
Kester, Arnold D. M. ;
Lisowski, Lukas ;
Grimm, Bernd ;
Heyligers, Ide C. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (10) :1187-1193
[8]   Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: Comparison of three scoring systems [J].
Liow, RYL ;
Walker, K ;
Wajid, MA ;
Bedi, G ;
Lennox, CME .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 26 (02) :143-149
[9]   The innervation of patella: anatomical and clinical study [J].
Maralcan, G ;
Kuru, I ;
Issi, S ;
Esmer, AF ;
Tekdemir, I ;
Evcik, D .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2005, 27 (04) :331-335
[10]   Secondary resurfacing of the patella in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty [J].
Mockford, BJ ;
Beverland, DE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :898-902