Development of syntactic complexity in Chinese university students' L2 argumentative writing

被引:22
作者
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Nikitina, Larisa [1 ]
Riget, Patricia Nora [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Languages & Linguist, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Mudanjiang Normal Univ, Sch Western Languages, Mudanjiang City 157000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Syntactic complexity; Second language writing; Writing development; Academic writing; Argumentative essays; First-year university students; NOUN PHRASE; LANGUAGE; ENGLISH; LEVEL; LEARNERS; QUALITY; WRITTEN; WRITERS; ACCURACY; FLUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101099
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examines how syntactic complexity evolves in argumentative L2 writing by Chinese first-year university students (N = 102). The participants were at either a low-or upper intermediate level of English language proficiency, like the majority of the first-year non-English language major undergraduates in China. Notably, there has been little research on L2 writing development among such learners of English. The present study addresses this gap. The participants produced three argumentative essays throughout a semester-long academic L2 academic writing course. Drawing on a multidimensional perspective on syntactic complexity, the analysis employed twelve holistic complexity measures of three types. The data were analyzed with the aid of the Second Language Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (L2SCA) and Stanford Tregex. The findings showed a non-linear trajectory of syntactic complexity development. Notably, there was less of the coordinated clausal complexity and more of nominal complexity in the students' L2 writing. The upper-intermediate group showed greater progress in employing complex nominal types, and there were statistically significant differences in the measures of pre-adjective, post preposition and nominal clauses between the two groups. Pedagogical implications are drawn from these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Ai H., 2013, Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data, P249, DOI DOI 10.1075/SCL.59.15AI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COMPUT LINGUIST, DOI DOI 10.21236/ADA273556
[4]   Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics [J].
Ansarifar, Ahmad ;
Shahriari, Hesamoddin ;
Pishghadam, Reza .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2018, 31 :58-71
[5]   A 2ND LOOK AT T-UNIT ANALYSIS - RECONSIDERING THE SENTENCE [J].
BARDOVIHARLIG, K .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1992, 26 (02) :390-395
[6]  
BIBER D, 2016, APPL LINGUIST, V37, P639, DOI DOI 10.1093/APPLIN/AMU059
[7]   Pay Attention to the Phrasal Structures: Going Beyond T-UnitsA Response to WeiWei Yang [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2013, 47 (01) :192-201
[8]   Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany .
ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS, 2011, 15 :223-250
[9]   Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (01) :5-35
[10]   Adolescents' production of complex syntax in spoken and written expository and persuasive genres [J].
Brimo, Danielle ;
Hall-Mills, Shannon .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2019, 33 (03) :237-255