Ruptures and Repairs in Group Psychotherapy: Introduction to the Special Issue

被引:10
作者
Marmarosh, Cheri L. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Profess Psychol Program, 1922 F St, Washington, DC 20008 USA
关键词
group therapy; cohesion; ruptures; alliance; conflict; GROUP-THERAPY; WORKING ALLIANCE; ATTACHMENT; ORIENTATION; PATIENT; MICROAGGRESSIONS; PERSONALITY; COHESION; EMPATHY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1037/gdn0000150
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objectives: All relationships experience tensions and ruptures, but not all ruptures are acknowledged and repaired. Individual therapy researchers have shown that repairing ruptures in the therapy relationship is associated with an increased alliance, decreased dropout, and positive treatment outcome. Until recently, there has been less attention paid to ruptures in group psychotherapy. The current special issue is devoted to theory, assessment, research, and practice regarding ruptures and repairs in group treatment. Methods: Group researchers applied self-report and observational assessment methods to identify and study ruptures in group psychotherapy and group supervision. Designs of the studies included longitudinal analysis, case studies, meta-analysis, and a practice review. Results: Studies in this special issue identified that the alliance is related to outcomes and that different types of alliance ruptures, including microaggressions, occur in group therapy. Alliance ruptures manifest themselves at different levels of group interactions (member to member, member to leader, and member to group), which reflects the complex nature of this multiperson therapeutic context. Conclusions: The implications for practice are addressed as well as a call for future research to examine different types of ruptures in group therapy. Group member and leader factors influence the nature of the ruptures. The complexity of the group context suggests that repair processes that take into account levels of interactions in groups. Findings from these studies lay the foundation for future research needed to understand the impact of ruptures in groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Alliance in Group Therapy: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Alldredge, Cameron T. ;
Burlingame, Gary M. ;
Yang, Chongming ;
Rosendahl, Jenny .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 25 (01) :13-28
[2]  
Barkham M., 2017, How and why are some therapists better than others?: Understanding therapist effects, P13, DOI [10.1037/0000034-002, DOI 10.1037/0000034-002]
[3]   Mixed methods in psychotherapy research: A review of method(ology) integration in psychotherapy science [J].
Bartholomew, Theodore T. ;
Lockard, Allison J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 74 (10) :1687-1709
[4]  
Bateman A., INT J GROUP PSYCHOTH
[5]   Race Dialogues in Group Psychotherapy: Key Issues in Training and Practice [J].
Bemak, Fred ;
Chung, Rita Chi-Ying .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2019, 69 (02) :172-191
[6]   A meta-analysis of the relation between patient adult attachment style and the working alliance [J].
Bernecker, Samantha L. ;
Levy, Kenneth N. ;
Ellison, William D. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2014, 24 (01) :12-24
[7]  
Bowlby J., 1988, A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Therapy
[8]   Personality, Leadership Style, and Theoretical Orientation as Predictors of Group Co-Leadership Satisfaction [J].
Bridbord, Karen ;
DeLucia-Waack, Janice .
JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK, 2011, 36 (03) :202-221
[9]  
Burlingame G. M., INT J GROUP PSYCHOTH
[10]  
Burlingame G M., 2017, Administration and scoring manual for the group questionnaire OQ-GQ