Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study

被引:15
作者
Altan, L. [1 ,2 ]
Aksoy, M. Kasapoglu [2 ]
Ozturk, E. Kosegil [2 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Med Fac, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-16800 Yildirim, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Ultrasound treatment; Phonophoresis; Acute low back pain; Diclofenac; Thiocolchioside; SINGLE-BLIND; MUSCLE; SAFETY; MHZ;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultras.2018.08.008
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of Phonophoresis (PP) with the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) and myorelaxant versus routine Ultrasound (US) treatment with non-therapeutic gel on the patients with acute low back pain (ABP). Methods: Sixty patients with ABP were randomly assigned into 2 groups. In Group 1 (n = 30) US was applied using diclofenac + Thiocolchicoside gel for 10 min and for a total of 10 sessions. In Group 2 (n = 30) the same US protocol was applied with the same setting and timing with Group 1 using US gel that does not contain any pharmaceutical ingredient. Evaluation parameters were Visual numeric scale (VNS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Shober test. Results: Comparison of the results obtained from the two groups before treatment and at second (W2) and sixth weeks (W6) posttreatment showed significant improvement in all parameters in both groups (p < 0.05). Comparison of the groups showed significantly superior improvement in Group 1 for ODI while there was no difference in other parameters at W2. At W6, there was significantly superior improvement in all parameters (p < 0.05) except for Shober test in Group1. Conclusion: Our results showed that PP treatment is superior than conventional US therapy at short term in ABP patients.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Aksoy C, 2002, J Orthop Traumatol, V3, P103, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S101950200036, 10.1007/s101950200036]
[2]  
Ansari N N, 2006, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V46, P329
[3]   Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome [J].
Ay, Saime ;
Dogan, Sebnem Koldas ;
Evcik, Deniz ;
Baser, Ozgun Cakmak .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (09) :1203-1208
[4]   A review of therapeutic ultrasound: Biophysical effects [J].
Baker, KG ;
Robertson, VJ ;
Duck, FA .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (07) :1351-1358
[5]  
BRISSON P, 1974, CAN MED ASSOC J, V110, P1182
[6]  
Chhetri RS, 2017, J NEPAL MED ASSOC, V56, P357
[7]   Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association [J].
Delitto, Anthony ;
George, Steven Z. ;
Van Dillen, Linda ;
Whitman, Julie M. ;
Sowa, Gwendolyn ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Denninger, Thomas R. ;
Godges, Joseph J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (04) :A1-A57
[8]  
Derry S., 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V12
[9]   RATE OF TEMPERATURE INCREASE IN HUMAN MUSCLE DURING 1 MHZ AND 3 MHZ CONTINUOUS ULTRASOUND [J].
DRAPER, DO ;
CASTEL, JC ;
CASTEL, D .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 22 (04) :142-150
[10]   A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of phonophoresis for the treatment of chronic neck pain [J].
Durmus, Dilek ;
Alayli, Gamze ;
Tufekci, Tugce ;
Kuru, Omer .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (05) :605-611