Measuring L1 and L2 Productive Derivational Knowledge: How Many Derivatives Can L1 and L2 Learners with Differing Vocabulary Levels Produce?

被引:15
作者
Iwaizumi, Emi [1 ]
Webb, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Appl Linguist, London, ON, Canada
关键词
WORD; ACQUISITION; AWARENESS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/tesq.3035
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Derivational knowledge, the ability to understand and produce derivatives of a word, is essential for vocabulary learners to expand their lexical knowledge. Earlier research (e.g., Schmitt & Zimmerman, 2002) has shown that L2 learners may have limited ability to produce derivatives compared to L1 speakers. However, the degree to which productive derivational knowledge differs between L1 and L2 learners, and among learners at different levels of vocabulary knowledge has yet to be examined. The present study investigated the extent to which L1 English speakers (n = 23) and L2 English learners (n = 107) at varying vocabulary levels (1000-5000) could produce the derivatives of 90 headwords in a decontextualized derivative recall test. A generalized linear mixed model indicated that L1 and L2 productive derivational knowledge significantly differed, and L2 productive derivational knowledge differed among learners with different vocabulary levels. However, the results revealed that the L1 speakers and the learners who had mastered the higher vocabulary levels (3000-5000) produced a similar number of derivatives in the decontextualized recall test. The findings suggest that learners' vocabulary levels could be indicative of L2 productive derivational knowledge to some degree. Lastly, the results are discussed to provide pedagogical implications for teaching and assessing L2 productive derivational knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 129
页数:30
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   AGE OF ONSET AND NATIVELIKE L2 ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT OF MORPHOSYNTACTIC AND PHONETIC INTUITION [J].
Abrahamsson, Niclas .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2012, 34 (02) :187-214
[2]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[3]  
Bauer L., 2020, English morphology for the language teaching profession, DOI [10.4324/9780367855222, DOI 10.4324/9780367855222]
[4]  
Bauer L., 1993, INT J LEXICOGR, V6, P253, DOI DOI 10.1093/IJL/6.4.253
[5]   Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition [J].
Biemiller, A ;
Slonim, N .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 93 (03) :498-520
[6]  
Bretz F., 2011, MULTIPLE COMP USING
[7]   Is There a Core General Vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List [J].
Brezina, Vaclav ;
Gablasova, Dana .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 36 (01) :1-22
[8]  
Carlisle J.F., 1995, MORPHOLOGICAL ASPECT, P189, DOI DOI 10.2307/495689
[9]   Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading [J].
Carlisle, JF .
READING AND WRITING, 2000, 12 (3-4) :169-190
[10]   An exploratory study of morphological errors in children's written stories [J].
Carlisle, JF .
READING AND WRITING, 1996, 8 (01) :61-72