Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws

被引:166
作者
Verma, Rajeev [1 ]
Krishan, Sonal [2 ]
Haendlmayer, Kurt
Mohsen, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Huddersfield Royal Infirm, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Gen Infirm, Radiol Acad, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Hull Royal Infirm, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
关键词
Spine; Pedicle screws; Navigation; Conventional; POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; CLINICAL ACCURACY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; IMAGE-GUIDANCE; CERVICAL-SPINE; SURGERY; LUMBAR; INSERTION; FIXATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
A number of studies have shown increased accuracy of pedicle screw placement in spine with the help of computer-assisted navigation. The literature is lacking in regard to functional benefit derived from this technique. The aim of this systematic review was to look at the functional outcomes following computer-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine. A 'Dialog Datastar' search was used using optimized search strategy covering the period from 1950 to July 2009; 23 papers were finally included which met our inclusion criteria. We report on a total of 1,288 patients with 5,992 pedicle screws. The comparison of neurological complications in two groups demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI 0.06, 1.14) in favour of using navigation for pedicle screw insertion (p = 0.07). Comparative trials demonstrated a significant advantage in terms of accuracy of navigation over conventional pedicle screw insertion with a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI 1.09, 1.15) (p < 0.00001). Navigation does not show statistically significant benefit in reducing neurological complications and there was insufficient data in the literature to infer a conclusion in terms of fusion rate, pain relief and health outcome scores.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 375
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) :485-485
[2]   Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine [J].
Amiot, LP ;
Lang, K ;
Putzier, M ;
Zippel, H ;
Labelle, H .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :606-614
[3]  
Arand M, 2001, UNFALLCHIRURG, V104, P1076, DOI 10.1007/s001130170023
[4]  
BOSTELMANN R, 2004, SCHWEIZ RUNDSCH MED, V93, P96, DOI DOI 10.1024/0369-8394.93.4.96
[5]   Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae [J].
Castro, WHM ;
Halm, H ;
Jerosch, J ;
Malms, J ;
Steinbeck, J ;
Blasius, S .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (11) :1320-1324
[6]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384
[7]   BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISONS OF SPINAL FRACTURE MODELS AND THE STABILIZING EFFECTS OF POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATIONS [J].
FERGUSON, RL ;
TENCER, AF ;
WOODARD, P ;
ALLEN, BL .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (05) :453-460
[8]   ACCURACY OF PEDICULAR SCREW PLACEMENT INVIVO [J].
GERTZBEIN, SD ;
ROBBINS, SE .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (01) :11-14
[9]   The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance [J].
Girardi, FP ;
Cammisa, FP ;
Sandhu, HS ;
Alvarez, L .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05) :825-829
[10]   INVITED COMMENTARY - A CRITICAL-LOOK AT SOME POPULAR METAANALYTIC METHODS [J].
GREENLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 140 (03) :290-296