Understanding scientists' communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture

被引:10
作者
Getson, Jackie M. [1 ]
Church, Sarah P. [1 ,2 ]
Radulski, Brennan G. [1 ,2 ]
Sjostrand, Anders E. [1 ,3 ]
Lu, Junyu [1 ,4 ]
Prokopy, Linda S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Montana State Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Bozeman, MT USA
[3] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, Boone, NC USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Community Resource & Dev, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] Purdue Univ, Hort & Landscape Architecture, W Lafayette, IN USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; FARMER PERCEPTIONS; UNITED-STATES; ADAPTATION; ADVISERS; RISK; OPINION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0269927
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the United States, a public debate remains about the existence and effects of anthropogenic climate change. This skepticism is present in the agricultural sector, rendering climate science communication challenging. Due to the polarization of climate change issues and the concurrent need for agricultural adaptation, we sought to examine how scientists communicate in this sector. A survey, administered to climate scientists and pertinent U.S. federal agency staff (response rate = 43%), was conducted to examine perspectives on communicating with five agricultural stakeholder groups: agribusinesses, crop advisors, general public, producers, and policymakers. We focused on three aspects of the communication process with these stakeholders to evaluate if scientists, as messengers, were following best practices-communicator training, knowledge of stakeholder, and terminology use. We found scientists valued communication training; however, the majority had not attended formal training. Scientists had different views on climate change than producers and crop advisors but understood their perspective and were deliberate with their communication with different audiences. This suggests stakeholder knowledge and terminology use do not hinder communication between scientist and stakeholder. We also highlight three communication challenges present across stakeholder groups-stakeholder knowledge, timescale, and scientific uncertainty-and others that were specific to each stakeholder group. Future research should support scientists by identifying and resolving barriers to training and effective communication strategies for each stakeholder group that addresses these challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Adaption Science Interagency Working Group, 2013, US GLOBAL CHANGE RES
[2]  
Albarracin D., 2010, The Handbook of Social Psychology, P394, DOI 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001011
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SCI ENGAGE PUBLIC
[4]   Understanding Corn Belt farmer perspectives on climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation [J].
Arbuckle, J. G., Jr. ;
Hobbs, J. ;
Loy, A. ;
Morton, L. W. ;
Prokopy, L. S. ;
Tyndall, J. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2014, 69 (06) :505-516
[5]   Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States [J].
Arbuckle, J. Gordon, Jr. ;
Prokopy, Linda Stalker ;
Haigh, Tonya ;
Hobbs, Jon ;
Knoot, Tricia ;
Knutson, Cody ;
Loy, Adam ;
Mase, Amber Saylor ;
McGuire, Jean ;
Morton, Lois Wright ;
Tyndall, John ;
Widhalm, Melissa .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 117 (04) :943-950
[6]  
Arbuckle Jr J.G., 2020, Extension Report SOC 3094
[7]  
Austin E.W., 2015, Strategic public relations management: Planning and managing effective communication programs, VThird
[8]   The Impact of Message Source on the Effectiveness of Communications About Climate Change [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Palm, Risa ;
Kingsland, Justin T. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2019, 41 (04) :464-487
[9]   Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change [J].
Breakwell, Glynis M. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2010, 1 (06) :857-870
[10]   Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology [J].
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Kim, Eunkyung ;
Lewenstein, Bruce V. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (05) :546-558