Chaos and rules: Should responses to violent crises always be constitutional?

被引:225
作者
Gross, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Law, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3657515
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Article suggests that legal models that have been traditionally invoked in the context of fashioning responses to emergencies may not always be adequate. Rather, there may be circumstances when the appropriate method of tackling grave threats entails going outside the legal order, at times even violating otherwise accepted constitutional principles.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / +
页数:125
相关论文
共 492 条
[51]   1ST AMENDMENT AND POLITICAL SPEECH - INQUIRY INTO SUBSTANCE AND LIMITS OF PRINCIPLE [J].
BEVIER, LR .
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1978, 30 (02) :299-358
[52]  
Black Charles, 1961, Harper'sFebruary, P63
[53]  
BLACKSHIELD T, 1998, AUSTR CONSTITUTIONAL, P647
[54]   THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT [J].
BLASI, V .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1985, 85 (03) :449-514
[55]  
BLASI V, 1985, COLUMBIA LAW REV, V85, P457
[56]  
BOBBITT P, 1991, CONSTITUTIONAL INTER, P17
[57]  
Bonner David., 1985, EMERGENCY POWERS PEA
[58]  
BOOTH W, 2001, WASH POST 1102, pA1
[59]  
BORGER J, 2002, GUARDIAN 0607, P1
[60]  
BRADLEY AW, 1997, CONSTITUTIONAL ADM L, P667