Maternal perceived discrimination and association with gestational diabetes

被引:13
作者
MacGregor, Caitlin [1 ]
Freedman, Alexa [1 ,2 ]
Keenan-Devlin, Lauren [1 ,3 ]
Grobman, William [3 ]
Wadhwa, Pathik [4 ]
Simhan, Hyagriv N. [5 ]
Buss, Claudia [6 ]
Borders, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, NorthShore Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med,Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dev Hlth & Dis Res Program, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
discrimination; gestational diabetes; health disparities; maternal health; obesity; pregnancy; socioeconomic status; stress; GROUP PRENATAL-CARE; RACIAL-DISCRIMINATION; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; INTERNALIZED RACISM; BIRTH-WEIGHT; PREGNANCY; OBESITY; RISK; STRESS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100222
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Maternal psychosocial stress, including experiences of discrimination, has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Perceived discrimination may activate the chronic stress response, the downstream effects of which include dysregulation of metabolic and immune systems. The effect of perceived discrimination on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus, a metabolic disorder of pregnancy, has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between perceived maternal discrimination and incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 744 pregnant women was conducted from 2013 to 2015 at 4 sites in the United States. Participants were women who were >= 18 years old with a singleton pregnancy, <21 weeks pregnant when recruited into the study, and English speaking without fetal anomalies, progesterone treatment, or corticosteroid use during pregnancy. Women with pregestational diabetes were excluded from the study. Participants with a gestational age between 12 0/ 7 and 20 6/7 weeks completed the Williams Discrimination Scale. For this analysis, Williams Discrimination Scale scores were dichotomized at the 75th percentile. We estimated the association between scoring in the top quartile of the Williams Discrimination Scale and developing gestational diabetes mellitus using logistic regression. As obesity is an independent risk factor for developing gestational diabetes mellitus, we also used mediation methods to determine the proportion of the association mediated by prepregnancy obesity (body mass index, >30 kg/m(2)). Models were adjusted for maternal age, income, parity, race and ethnicity, and study site. RESULTS: Among the 595 eligible subjects, 368 (61.9%) were white, 99 (16.6%) black, and 93 (15.6%) Hispanic. The mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m(2) (standard deviation, 7.1 kg/m(2)), and 50 subjects (8.4%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus were significantly more likely to be older, to be multiparous, and to have a lower income. Scoring in the top quartile of the Williams Discrimination Scale was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (12.8% vs 7.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.22). Obesity mediated 22.6% of the relationship between the Williams Discrimination Scale and gestational diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Women who perceived greater discrimination had an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Results from the mediation analysis indicate that more than 20% of the association between discrimination and gestational diabetes mellitus operates via a pathway that includes obesity. Future studies should examine this and other mechanistic pathways that may underlie these associations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Stress, eating and the reward system
    Adam, Tanja C.
    Epel, Elissa S.
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2007, 91 (04) : 449 - 458
  • [2] Racial Discrimination and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Integrative Review
    Alhusen, Jeanne L.
    Bower, Kelly M.
    Epstein, Elizabeth
    Sharps, Phyllis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 61 (06) : 707 - 720
  • [3] Sociodemographic Correlates of the Increasing Trend in Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Large Population of Women Between 1995 and 2005
    Anna, Vibeke
    van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
    Cheung, N. Wah
    Huxley, Rachel R.
    Bauman, Adrian E.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (12) : 2288 - 2293
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, Obstet Gynecol, V122, P406, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1
  • [5] Bo S, 2002, DIABETES METAB, V28, P139
  • [6] Racial or Ethnic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Adherence to National Dietary Guidance in a Large Cohort of US Pregnant Women
    Bodnar, Lisa M.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Parker, Corette B.
    Meier, Heather
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Grobman, William A.
    Haas, David M.
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Parry, Samuel
    Silver, Robert M.
    Saade, George R.
    Wapner, Ronald
    Lams, Jay D.
    Wadhwa, Pathik D.
    Elovitz, Michal
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    Esplin, Sean
    Barnes, Shannon
    Reddy, Uma M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2017, 117 (06) : 867 - 877
  • [7] Butte NF, 2000, AM J CLIN NUTR, V71, p1256S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1256s
  • [8] Chambers EC, 2004, J NATL MED ASSOC, V96, P1594
  • [9] Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes
    Crowther, CA
    Hiller, JE
    Moss, JR
    McPhee, AJ
    Jeffries, WS
    Robinson, JS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (24) : 2477 - 2486
  • [10] Epigenomics, gestational programming and risk of metabolic syndrome
    Desai, M.
    Jellyman, J. K.
    Ross, M. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2015, 39 (04) : 633 - 641