Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry

被引:235
作者
An, Runying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Biying [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Ru [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Yi-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Energy Econ & Environm Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Sustainable Dev Res Inst Econ & Soc Beijing, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Iron and steel industry; Technology development path; Energy consumption; CO2; emissions; Abatement cost; National Energy Technology model; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CONSERVATION; EFFICIENCY; MITIGATION; COST; TECHNOLOGIES; CONSUMPTION; INTENSITY; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.044
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The iron and steel industry plays an important role in mitigating global climate change. As the largest steel producer and consumer, China bears the primary responsibility for energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in the iron and steel industry. In this study, taking China as the empirical context, we analyze the effectiveness of the following four strategies on the potential of energy savings and emission reduction: phasing out backward production capacity in accordance with the current major policies, adjusting the production structure to increase electric arc furnace steelmaking, promoting low-carbon technologies, and switching to clean fuels. Under the principle of cost minimization, the mitigation potential of different strategies until 2030 and the technological development paths for reducing energy and CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry are identified via an established National Energy Technology model. The results show that promoting low-carbon technologies is the most effective strategy for energy savings and emission reduction alongside cost minimization. Compared with existing policies, these strategies could lead to a cumulative reduction of 818.3 MtCO(2) (4.1%) during the period 2015-2030. Therefore, policy makers should provide financial or administrative support to promote the development of specific production and low-carbon technologies such as non-blast furnace iron-making and endless strip production.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 880
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHIN 13 5 YEAR NAT E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ANN EN OUTL 2016
[3]   Energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation potential of the Turkish iron and steel industry using the LEAP (long-range energy alternatives planning) system [J].
Ates, Seyithan A. .
ENERGY, 2015, 90 :417-428
[4]   A plant-specific bottom-up approach for assessing the cost-effective energy conservation potential and its ability to compensate rising energy-related costs in the German iron and steel industry [J].
Brunke, Jean-Christian ;
Blesl, Markus .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 :431-446
[5]   Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China [J].
Chen, Qianqian ;
Gu, Yu ;
Tang, Zhiyong ;
Wei, Wei ;
Sun, Yuhan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 220 :192-207
[6]   A bottom-up analysis of China's iron and steel industrial energy consumption and CO2 emissions [J].
Chen, Wenying ;
Yin, Xiang ;
Ma, Ding .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 136 :1174-1183
[7]  
Ciftci B., 2017, Potential game changers for the future of steel making
[8]  
CISA, 2016, CHIN STEEL YB 2016
[9]   An outlook into energy consumption in large scale industries in India: The cases of steel, aluminium and cement [J].
Dutta, Monica ;
Mukherjee, Saptarshi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :7286-7298
[10]   Current situation of energy consumption and measures taken for energy saving in the iron and steel industry in China [J].
Guo, Z. C. ;
Fu, Z. X. .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (11) :4356-4360