Hybrid of discrete wavelet transform and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for overall driving behavior recognition

被引:50
作者
Eftekhari, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Ghatee, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Driver behavior evaluation; Wavelet transform; Aggressive driving; Smartphone sensors; ANFIS; Decision fusion; Pattern recognition; TRANSPORTATION MODES; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; ANGER SCALE; CLASSIFICATION; SMARTPHONES; PROPENSITY; TELEMATICS; NETWORK; FUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.044
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Monitoring and evaluating of driving behavior is the main goal of this paper that encourage us to develop a new system based on Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors of smart phones. In this system, a hybrid of Discrete Wavelet Transformation (DWT) and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used to recognize overall driving behaviors. The behaviors are classified into the safe, the semi-aggressive, and the aggressive classes that are adopted with Driver Anger Scale (DAS) self-reported questionnaire results. The proposed system extracts four features from IMU sensors in the forms of time series. They are decomposed by DWT in two levels and their energies are sent to six ANFISs. Each ANFIS models the different perception about driving behavior under uncertain knowledge and returns the similarity or dissimilarity between driving behaviors. The results of these six ANFISs are combined by three different decision fusion approaches. Results show that Coiflet-2 is the most suitable mother wavelet for driving behavior analysis. In addition, the proposed system recognizes the overall driving behavior patterns with 92% accuracy without necessity to evaluate the maneuvers one by one. We show that without longitude acceleration data, the driver behavior cannot be recognized successfully while the results do not disturb substantially when the gyroscope is not available. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 796
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   A Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for the Classification of Dynamic Activities From Accelerometer Data [J].
Preece, Stephen J. ;
Goulermas, John Yannis ;
Kenney, Laurence P. J. ;
Howard, David .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (03) :871-879
[42]  
Promwongsa N., 2014, 13 ITS AS PAC FOR AU
[43]   ERRORS AND VIOLATIONS ON THE ROADS - A REAL DISTINCTION [J].
REASON, J ;
MANSTEAD, A ;
STRADLING, S ;
BAXTER, J ;
CAMPBELL, K .
ERGONOMICS, 1990, 33 (10-11) :1315-1332
[44]   Classification of waist-acceleration signals in a continuous walking record [J].
Sekine, M ;
Tamura, T ;
Togawa, T ;
Fukui, Y .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2000, 22 (04) :285-291
[45]  
Sullman M.J.M, 2006, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V9, P3
[46]   A comparison of the Driving Anger Scale and the Propensity for Angry Cross Mark Driving Scale [J].
Sullman, Mark J. M. ;
Stephens, Amanda N. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 58 :88-96
[47]  
Tasca L., 2000, 1 GLOB WEB C AGGR DR
[48]  
Vaiana R., 2014, Modern Applied Science, V8, P88, DOI DOI 10.5539/MAS.V8N1P88
[49]   Aggressive driving: A survey of attitudes, opinions and behaviors [J].
Vanlaar, Ward ;
Simpson, Herb ;
Mayhew, Dan ;
Robertson, Robyn .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (04) :375-381
[50]  
Wahlstrom J, 2015, P 2 WORKSH WORKSH PH