Second-trimester prediction of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age neonate: integrating sequential Doppler information, fetal biometry, and maternal characteristics

被引:13
|
作者
Seravalli, Viola [1 ]
Block-Abraham, Dana M. [1 ]
Turan, Ozhan M. [1 ]
Doyle, Lauren E. [1 ]
Blitzer, Miriam G. [2 ]
Baschat, Ahmet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER; GROWTH RESTRICTION; TRANSVAGINAL UTERINE; BLOOD-FLOW; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; INDEXES; DIAGNOSIS; FETUS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/pd.4418
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the predictive accuracy of second-trimester ultrasound parameters, maternal characteristics, and sequential Doppler changes between first and second trimesters for the prediction of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants (birth weight<10th percentile). MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of singleton pregnancies enrolled in the first trimester with subsequent second-trimester follow-up. Maternal characteristics, uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI), fetal biometry, and umbilical artery (UA)-PI were ascertained. UtA and UA-PI change from first to second trimester was calculated (UtA-PI and UA-PI). These parameters were tested for their ability to predict delivery of an SGA infant. ResultsAmong 1982 women, 172 delivered an SGA neonate. African-American ethnicity, nulliparity, tobacco use, and low abdominal circumference (AC) z-score were independent predictors of SGA. No difference was found in the magnitude of UtA-PI and UA-PI between SGA and no-SGA. Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.700 for AC z-score. The combination of low AC and bilateral notching had high specificity (99%) but low sensitivity (7%) for SGA prediction. ConclusionsA small second-trimester fetal AC is a specific marker for SGA when found with bilateral UtA notching. Only a small proportion is predicted by the factors studied, suggesting a small contributory role or later evolution of SGA. (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1043
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate
    Nowacka, U.
    Papastefanou, I
    Bouariu, A.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [2] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval
    Reboul, Q.
    Delabaere, A.
    Luo, Z. C.
    Nuyt, A. -M.
    Wu, Y.
    Chauleur, C.
    Fraser, W.
    Audibert, F.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 372 - 378
  • [3] First-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates incorporating fetal Doppler parameters and maternal characteristics
    Seravalli, Viola
    Block-Abraham, Dana M.
    Turan, Ozhan M.
    Doyle, Lauren E.
    Kopelman, Jerome N.
    Atlas, Robert O.
    Jenkins, Chuka B.
    Blitzer, Miriam G.
    Baschat, Ahmet A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (03) : 261.e1 - 261.e8
  • [4] Mid-pregnancy fetal biometry, uterine artery Doppler indices and maternal demographic characteristics: role in prediction of small-for-gestational-age birth
    Familiari, Alessandra
    Bhide, Amar
    Morlando, Maddalena
    Scala, Carolina
    Khalil, Asma
    Thilaganathan, Basky
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [5] Role of early second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening to predict small-for-gestational-age babies in nulliparous women
    Parry, Samuel
    Sciscione, Anthony
    Haas, David M.
    Grobman, William A.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Elovitz, Michal A.
    Schubert, Frank P.
    Peaceman, Alan
    Esplin, Sean
    Caritis, Steve
    Nageotte, Michael P.
    Carper, Benjamin A.
    Saade, George R.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Parker, Corette B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (05) : 594.e1 - 594.e10
  • [6] Second-Trimester 3-Dimensional Placental Sonography as a Predictor of Small-for-Gestational-Age Birth Weight
    Quant, Hayley S.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Parry, Samuel
    Schwartz, Nadav
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (08) : 1693 - 1702
  • [7] First-trimester and combined first- and second-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction
    Sotiriadis, A.
    Figueras, F.
    Eleftheriades, M.
    Papaioannou, G. K.
    Chorozoglou, G.
    Dinas, K.
    Papantoniou, N.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [8] Second-trimester maternal distress increases the risk of small for gestational age
    Khashan, A. S.
    Everard, C.
    McCowan, L. M. E.
    Dekker, G.
    Moss-Morris, R.
    Baker, P. N.
    Poston, L.
    Walker, J. J.
    Kenny, L. C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (13) : 2799 - 2810
  • [9] Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth
    Doulaveris, Georgios
    Gallagher, Patience
    Romney, Elizabeth
    Richley, Michael
    Gebb, Juliana
    Rosner, Mara
    Dar, Pe'er
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (14) : 2415 - 2421
  • [10] Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth restriction
    Crovetto, F.
    Triunfo, S.
    Crispi, F.
    Rodriguez-Sureda, V.
    Dominguez, C.
    Figueras, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 349 - 356