Usability Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Geriatric ED Pain Treatment

被引:13
作者
Genes, Nicholas [1 ]
Kim, Min Soon [2 ,3 ]
Thum, Frederick L. [1 ]
Rivera, Laura [1 ]
Beato, Rosemary [1 ]
Song, Carolyn [1 ]
Soriano, Jared [4 ]
Kannry, Joseph [4 ,5 ]
Baumlin, Kevin [1 ]
Hwang, Ula [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Inst Informat, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Mt Sinai Hlth Syst, Informat Technol, New York, NY USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Gen Internal Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Brookdale Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[7] James J Peters VAMC, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
Clinical decision support systems; decision support techniques; aged; acute pain; medical record systems; computerized; man-machine systems; HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ORDER ENTRY; IMPACT; CARE; ADHERENCE; ALERT; MEDICATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.4338/ACI-2015-08-RA-0108
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Older adults are at risk for inadequate emergency department (ED) pain care. Unrelieved acute pain is associated with poor outcomes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) hold promise to improve patient care, but CDSS quality varies widely, particularly when usability evaluation is not employed. Objective: To conduct an iterative usability and redesign process of a novel geriatric abdominal pain care CDSS. We hypothesized this process would result in the creation of more usable and favorable pain care interventions. Methods: Thirteen emergency physicians familiar with the Electronic Health Record (EHR) in use at the study site were recruited. Over a 10-week period, 17 1-hour usability test sessions were conducted across 3 rounds of testing. Participants were given 3 patient scenarios and provided simulated clinical care using the EHR, while interacting with the CDSS interventions. Quantitative System Usability Scores (SUS), favorability scores and qualitative narrative feedback were collected for each session. Using a multi-step review process by an interdisciplinary team, positive and negative usability issues in effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction were considered, prioritized and incorporated in the iterative redesign process of the CDSS. Video analysis was used to determine the appropriateness of the CDS appearances during simulated clinical care. Results: Over the 3 rounds of usability evaluations and subsequent redesign processes, mean SUS progressively improved from 74.8 to 81.2 to 88.9; mean favorability scores improved from 3.23 to 4.29 (1 worst, 5 best). Video analysis revealed that, in the course of the iterative redesign processes, rates of physicians' acknowledgment of CDS interventions increased, however most rates of desired actions by physicians (such as more frequent pain score updates) decreased. Conclusion: The iterative usability redesign process was instrumental in improving the usability of the CDSS; if implemented in practice, it could improve geriatric pain care. The usability evaluation process led to improved acknowledgement and favorability. Incorporating usability testing when designing CDSS interventions for studies may be effective to enhance clinician use.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 142
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AGS GUIDELINE MANAGE
[2]  
Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
[3]   Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality [J].
Bates, DW ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Wang, S ;
Gandhi, T ;
Kittler, A ;
Volk, L ;
Spurr, C ;
Khorasani, R ;
Tanasijevic, M ;
Middleton, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2003, 10 (06) :523-530
[4]   IMPACT OF A COMPUTERIZED ORDER SET ON ADHERENCE TO CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT [J].
Britton, Daniel J. ;
Bloch, Rebecca B. ;
Strout, Tania D. ;
Baumann, Michael R. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (02) :528-535
[5]  
BROOKE J, USABILITY EVALUATION, P189
[6]  
Bukata R., 2014, EMER PHYS MONTHLY, V10, P4
[7]   Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care [J].
Chaudhry, Basit ;
Wang, Jerome ;
Wu, Shinyi ;
Maglione, Margaret ;
Mojica, Walter ;
Roth, Elizabeth ;
Morton, Sally C. ;
Shekelle, Paul G. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (10) :742-752
[8]   COGNITIVE STATUS AND POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - OLDER ADULTS [J].
DUGGLEBY, W ;
LANDER, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1994, 9 (01) :19-27
[9]  
Dworkin RH, 1997, PAIN FORUM, V6, P127
[10]   Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR A Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Emani, S. ;
Ting, D. Y. ;
Healey, M. ;
Lipsitz, S. R. ;
Karson, A. S. ;
Einbinder, J. S. ;
Leinen, L. ;
Suric, V. ;
Bates, D. W. .
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 5 (03) :789-801