Current United Kingdom sedation practice in pediatric intensive care

被引:98
作者
Jenkins, Ian A.
Playfor, Stephen D.
Bevan, Cliff
Davies, Gerald
Wolf, Andrew R.
机构
[1] Sedation Working Party, Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group
[2] Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8BJ, Upper Maudlin St
关键词
sedation; pediatric; critical care; analgesia; neuromuscular blocking agents; intensive care;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02180.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade in critically ill children on pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK and identify areas that merit further study. Methods: Data were gathered in a prospective observational study of 338 critically ill children in 20 UK PICUs. Results: There is considerable variation in clinical practice. A total of 24 different sedative and analgesic agents were used during the study. The most commonly used sedative and analgesic agents were midazolam and morphine. Four different neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) were used, most commonly vecuronium. There were differences in treatment between cardiac and noncardiac children, but there were a greater number of infants and neonates in the cardiac group. NMBs were used in 30% of mechanically ventilated patients. Withdrawal symptoms were reported in 13% of ventilated patients, relatively early in their stay; weaning sedative agents ('tapering') was apparently of no benefit. The use of clonidine in this setting was noted. Physical restraints were used in 7.4%. Propofol was used but in only 2.6% of patients, all over the age of 4 years, and not exceeding 2 mg.kg(-1).h(-1). No side effects attributable to 'propofol syndrome' were noted. Conclusions: There is considerable heterogeneity of sedation techniques. NMBs are used in a large portion of this population. Withdrawal symptoms were associated with higher doses of sedation and greater lengths of stay and were not ameliorated by withdrawing sedation gradually ('tapering').
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 683
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Autret E, 1999, PEDIATRICS, V104, P614
[2]  
EDWARDS KG, 1992, DIPRIVAN ICU SEDATIO
[3]  
FINNEGAN LP, 1975, ADDICT DIS, V2, P141
[4]   Occurrence of withdrawal in critically ill sedated children [J].
Fonsmark, L ;
Rasmussen, YH ;
Carl, P .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01) :196-199
[5]   StatsDirect - Statistical software for medical research in the 21st century [J].
Freemantle, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7275) :1536-1536
[6]  
HUGHES J, 1994, ACTA PAEDIATR, V83, P1194
[7]   Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult [J].
Jacobi, J ;
Fraser, GL ;
Coursin, DB ;
Riker, RR ;
Fontaine, D ;
Wittbrodt, ET ;
Chalfin, DB ;
Masica, MF ;
Bjerke, HS ;
Coplin, WM ;
Crippen, DW ;
Fuchs, BD ;
Kelleher, RM ;
Marik, PE ;
Nasraway, SA ;
Murray, MJ ;
Peruzzi, WT ;
Lumb, PD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (01) :119-141
[8]  
Martin Lynn D., 2001, Pediatr Crit Care Med, V2, P205, DOI 10.1097/00130478-200107000-00003
[9]  
MARX CM, 1993, PEDIATRICS, V91, P369
[10]  
MATTHEWS AJ, 1993, PEDIATR ANAESTHESIA, V3, P107