Mapping voxel-based statistical power on parametric images

被引:33
作者
Van Horn, JD [1 ]
Ellmore, TM [1 ]
Esposito, G [1 ]
Berman, KF [1 ]
机构
[1] NIMH, CBDB, Unit PET, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1997.0317
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Using a classic technique based on the noncentral F-distribution method for computing statistical power, we developed a general approach to the estimation of voxel-based power in functional brain image data analysis. We applied this method to PET data from a large sample (N = 40) of subjects performing the Wisconsin Card Sorting (WCST) paradigm analyzed with SPM95, produced statistical power maps for a range of sample sizes and smoothing filter widths, and examined the effects of sample size and image smoothing on the expected reliability of activation findings. At an uncorrected alpha of 0.01, a fixed filter size of 10 mm(3), and a range of power thresholds, maps revealed that the power to reject the null hypothesis in brain regions implicated in the task at Ns of 5 and 10 may not be sufficient to ensure reliable replication of significant findings and so should be interpreted with caution. At sample sizes approaching 20 subjects, sufficient power was found in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 46/9), right and left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40), and left inferior temporal lobe (BA 37), comprising the cortical network typically observed during the WCST. Filter size needed to maximize power varied widely, but systematically. across the brain, tending to follow known neuroanatomical landmarks. Statistical power considerations in brain imaging studies are critical for controlling the rate of false negatives and assuring reliable detection of cognitive activation. The variation of filter size for maximizing power across the brain suggests that the underlying neuroanatomy of functional units is an important consideration in the a priori selection of filter size. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 107
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Sample size and statistical power in [O-15]H2O studies of human cognition [J].
Andreasen, NC ;
Arndt, S ;
Cizadlo, T ;
OLeary, DS ;
Watkins, GL ;
Ponto, LLB ;
Hichwa, RD .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1996, 16 (05) :804-816
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, The Advanced Theory of Statistics
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1935, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, DOI DOI 10.2307/2983637
[4]   A SIMPLE OBJECTIVE TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING FLEXIBILITY IN THINKING [J].
Berg, Esta A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1948, 39 (01) :15-22
[5]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVATION OF A CORTICAL NETWORK DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST - A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY STUDY [J].
BERMAN, KF ;
OSTREM, JL ;
RANDOLPH, C ;
GOLD, J ;
GOLDBERG, TE ;
COPPOLA, R ;
CARSON, RE ;
HERSCOVITCH, P ;
WEINBERGER, DR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1995, 33 (08) :1027-1046
[6]  
BORSTEIN RA, 1986, INT J CLIN NEUROPSYC, V8, P18
[7]   Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis [J].
Bullmore, E ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, SCR ;
Rabehesketh, S ;
Janot, N ;
David, A ;
Mellers, J ;
Howard, R ;
Sham, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) :261-277
[8]  
CALLICOTT JH, 1997, SOC MAGNETIC RESONAN, P1655
[9]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[10]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-179060-8.50006-2