Reliability Analysis and Maintenance Program for Airline Seats

被引:0
作者
Rehmanjan, Ubair. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Qantas Airways, Mascot, Australia
来源
2017 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM | 2017年
关键词
Reliability Analysis; Maintenance Program; Airline Seats;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
All modern commercial aircraft are designed with a high degree of redundancy and with an emphasis on reliability and maintainability, having undergone a detailed MSG-3 (Maintenance Steering Group) type analysis and are delivered by the manufacturer with an evolving package of ongoing maintenance requirements to keep the aircraft serviceable and airworthy. Even though the airframe and engines are amongst the assets that have an extremely high amount of reliability analysis carried out and maintenance systems put in place; the interior of the aircraft, that is the cabin product is one that rarely gets any reliability analysis or maintenance schedule specified by the cabin manufacturers. The aircraft manufacturers do not get involved because often the cabin furnishings are chosen and customized by the airlines and these cabin products are known as Buyer Furnished Equipment (BFE).One of the common beliefs is that it does not matter if the cabin product is unserviceable as long as the aircraft is well maintained, however the customer (passenger) interacts with the cabin, in particular their seat and if they do not feel that the interior is being maintained and cleaned, they often thing that this airline maintains their aircraft similarly. If a proper MSG-3 or any RCM (Reliability Centered Maintenance) type analysis on the product had been carried out at either the design phase or at entry-into-service and a suitable maintenance system implemented, which continued to evolve, there would be no requirement for the labor-intensive defect reviews discussed here.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Reliability analysis comparison on punching tool sets due to different maintenance decisions: a case study from the pulp manufacturing industry [J].
Rosmaini Ahmad .
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 94 :1969-1979
[32]   Reliability analysis comparison on punching tool sets due to different maintenance decisions: a case study from the pulp manufacturing industry [J].
Ahmad, Rosmaini .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 94 (5-8) :1969-1979
[33]   Circuit Reliability Analysis Using Signal Reliability Correlations [J].
Cai, Jinchen ;
Chen, Chunhong .
2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE QUALITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY COMPANION (QRS-C), 2017, :171-176
[34]   Development of Maintenance Program with Markov-Simulation Method in Aviation Industry [J].
Nurcahyo, Rahmat ;
Arisaputra, A. E. ;
Farizal, Farizal .
2017 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLIED SCIENCES (ICETAS), 2017,
[35]   Reliability analysis of functional CNT [J].
S Shivhare ;
S Joshi ;
S Ahmed .
Chemistry Central Journal, 3 (Suppl 1)
[36]   Wind turbine reliability analysis [J].
Pinar Perez, Jesus Maria ;
Garcia Marquez, Fausto Pedro ;
Tobias, Andrew ;
Papaelias, Mayorkinos .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 23 :463-472
[37]   Reliability Analysis of CNC Grinder [J].
Fan, Jinwei ;
Liu, Chao ;
Liu, Yijia ;
Yi, Xiaolong .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING, 2015, 121 :1543-1546
[38]   Reliability Analysis of Logic Circuits [J].
Choudhury, Mihir R. ;
Mohanram, Kartik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 28 (03) :392-405
[39]   Hybrid modelling in reliability analysis [J].
Resteanu, C ;
Filip, FG .
QRM 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY, RELIABILITY, AND MAINTENANCE, 2002, :43-46
[40]   Analysis of Flap Mechanism Reliability [J].
Zhou, Jie ;
Sun, Zhili ;
Son, Qinglin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICMEIT 2017), 2017, 70 :621-628