Drivers of autonomous vehicles-analyzing consumer preferences for self-driving car brand extensions

被引:15
作者
Eggers, Felix [1 ]
Eggers, Fabian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Mkt, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Menlo Coll, Dept Mkt, 1000 El Camino Real, Atherton, CA 94027 USA
关键词
Autonomous cars; Brand extension; Brand image; Innovations; Conjoint analysis; FIT; SIMILARITY; SUCCESS; CONTEXT; CHOICE; IMPACT; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11002-021-09571-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Autonomous cars are considered to be the next disruptive innovation that will affect consumers. It can be expected that not only traditional automakers will enter this market (e.g., Ford) but also technology companies (e.g., Google) and newer companies dedicated to self-driving cars (e.g., Tesla). We take a brand extension perspective and analyze to what extent consumers prefer autonomous cars from these brand categories. Our empirical study is based on discrete choice experiments about adopting autonomous vehicles in a purchase scenario and in a renting context. Our findings show that brands play a central role when making autonomous driving decisions. Brand preferences differ systematically when buying versus renting a self-driving car. While technology brands are most preferred overall, consumers favor automaker brands over new brands only when purchasing, not when renting. We further disentangle the brand strength into the marginal effects of image associations. For example, Google's strong brand positioning can be explained by experiences with the parent brand, but it could still improve brand strength by highlighting the relevance of the associated brand portfolio for self-driving cars. The effect of these brand extension success factors differs between parent-brand categories and also between the renting and purchasing scenarios, which requires a dedicated brand management.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 112
页数:24
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Drivers of Brand Extension Success: What Really Matters for Luxury Brands [J].
Albrecht, Carmen-Maria ;
Backhaus, Christof ;
Gurzki, Hannes ;
Woisetschlaeger, David M. .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2013, 30 (08) :647-659
[2]   The Impact of Different Touchpoints on Brand Consideration [J].
Baxendale, Shane ;
Macdonald, Emma K. ;
Wilson, Hugh N. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (02) :235-253
[3]   Can All Brands Innovate in the Same Way? A Typology of Brand Position and Innovation Effort [J].
Beverland, Michael B. ;
Napoli, Julie ;
Farrelly, Francis .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (01) :33-48
[4]   The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles [J].
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Shariff, Azim ;
Rahwan, Iyad .
SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6293) :1573-1576
[5]   Understanding the interplay between brand and innovation management: findings and future research directions [J].
Brexendorf, Tim Oliver ;
Bayus, Barry ;
Keller, Kevin Lane .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2015, 43 (05) :548-557
[6]   Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning [J].
Brown, S ;
Kozinets, RV ;
Sherry, JF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (03) :19-33
[7]   Gotta catch 'em all: invigorating Pokemon through an innovative brand extension [J].
Butcher, Luke ;
Sung, Billy ;
Raynes-Goldie, Kate .
JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (03) :227-239
[8]   How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing [J].
Davenport, Thomas ;
Guha, Abhijit ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
Bressgott, Timna .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (01) :24-42
[9]   Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising [J].
Dens, Nathalie ;
De Pelsmacker, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2010, 63 (11) :1237-1244
[10]   Where have all the flowers gone? Forecasting green trends in the automobile industry with a choice-based conjoint adoption model [J].
Eggers, Felix ;
Eggers, Fabian .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (01) :51-62