Artificial wetlands as alternative habitat for a wide range of waterbird species

被引:25
作者
Rajpar, Muhammad Nawaz [2 ]
Ahmad, Shahid [1 ]
Zakaria, Muhammad [4 ]
Ahmad, Adnan [2 ]
Guo, Xinle [3 ]
Nabi, Ghulam [1 ,7 ]
Wanghe, Kunyuan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Key Lab Anim Physiol Biochem & Mol Biol Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang 050010, Peoples R China
[2] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Univ Sheringal Dir Upper, Fac Life Sci, Dept Forestry, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 18051, Pakistan
[3] Qinghai Normal Univ, Acad Plateau Sci & Sustainabil, Coll Life Sci, Xining, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Forestry & Environm, Dept Forestry Sci & Environm, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Qinghai Prov Key Lab Anim Ecol Genom, 23 rd Xinning Rd, Xining 810008, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, 23rd Xinning Rd, Xining 810008, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[7] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Life Sciencs, Key Labortary Anim Physiol Biochem & Mol Biol Hebe, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
关键词
Wetland birds; Natural wetlands; Artificial wetlands; Population; Diversity; Foraging guilds; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; AGRICULTURAL WETLANDS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; DIVERSITY; COMMUNITY; MANAGEMENT; RICHNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108855
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Natural wetlands are at the cutting edge of protection concerns, as they harbor a greater range of waterbird assemblages than artificial wetlands. However, more than 50.0% of natural wetland areas and more than 17.0% of waterbird species have become imperiled due to human activities over the last two decades. Thus, it is important to understand whether artificial wetlands play significant roles as alternative habitats for wetland birds. The distance sampling point count method was employed to ascertain the difference in waterbird assemblages inhabiting Lungh natural wetland and Raja artificial wetland in Sindh Province, Pakistan from September 2017 to February 2019. Natural wetlands harbored 39,282 individuals representing 40 waterbird species and 14 families, while artificial wetlands hosted 23,122 individuals representing 39 species and 13 families. In total, 37 species were identified as least concern, 3 were near threatened, and one species was endangered, one vulnerable, and one data deficient. Anas crecca (4.95%) and A. platyrhynchos (4.72%) were the foremost abundant species in natural wetlands. A. crecca (4.57%) and A. clypeata (3.95%) were the foremost prevailing species of artificial wetlands. Alcedo atthis, Charadrius leschenaultia, and Vanellus leucurus did not utilize natural wetlands, while Bubulcus ibis, Larus genei, Tringa brevipes, and Plegadis falcinellus avoided artificial wetlands. The relative abundance of waterbirds between natural and artificial wetlands varied considerably (F1, 85 = 6.26, p < 0.05). Diversity indices indicated that natural wetlands attracted a greater diversity of waterbirds than artificial wetlands. The results indicated that natural wetlands had attracted a larger number of migrating birds than artificial wetlands. In contrast, artificial wetlands harbored a wide range of resident waterbird species than natural wetlands. As a result, we accept the hypothesis that artificial wetlands may serve as an alternative habitat for a wide range of waterbird communities. Hence, it is strongly recommended that artificial wetlands be constructed to harbor a wider array of waterbird species to halt wetland habitats and biodiversity loss across the country.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Anyew T., 2009, NATURAL LAKES ETHIOP, P206
[2]  
Ayenew T., 2001, J HYDROSCI, V47, P493
[3]   Natural versus artificial- wetlands and their waterbirds in Sri Lanka [J].
Bellio, M. G. ;
Kingsford, R. T. ;
Kotagama, S. W. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (12) :3076-3085
[4]   Glorious past, uncertain present, bad future? Assessing effects of land-use changes on habitat suitability for a threatened farmland bird species [J].
Brambilla, Mattia ;
Casale, Fabio ;
Bergero, Valentina ;
Bogliani, Giuseppe ;
Crovetto, G. Matteo ;
Falco, Riccardo ;
Roati, Michaela ;
Negri, Irene .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (11) :2770-2778
[5]   Habitat choice, disturbance, and management of foraging shorebirds and gulls at a migratory stopover [J].
Burger, Joanna ;
Carlucci, Stacy A. ;
Jeitner, Christian W. ;
Niles, Larry .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 23 (05) :1159-1166
[6]   The Habitat Use and Home Range Analysis of Dunlin (Calidris alpina) in Chongming Dongtan, China and their Conservation Implications [J].
Choi, Chiyeung ;
Gan, Xiaojing ;
Hua, Ning ;
Wang, Yong ;
Ma, Zhijun .
WETLANDS, 2014, 34 (02) :255-266
[7]  
Choi Yu-Seong, 2008, Journal of Ecology and Field Biology, V31, P147
[8]   Effects of spatial habitat heterogeneity on habitat selection and annual fecundity for a migratory forest songbird [J].
Cornell, Kerri L. ;
Donovan, Therese M. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2010, 25 (01) :109-122
[9]   How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area [J].
Davidson, Nick C. .
MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2014, 65 (10) :934-941
[10]   Temporal and spatial variation of richness and abundance of the community of birds in the Pantanal wetlands of Nhecolandia (Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil) [J].
Donatelli, Reginaldo Jose ;
Eaton, Donald P. ;
Sementili-Cardoso, Guilherme ;
Vianna, Renata Marques ;
Gerotti, Raphael Whitacker ;
Rodrigues, Fernanda Goncalves ;
Martins, Rafael Martos .
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2017, 65 (04) :1358-1380