Lighting conditions used during visual shade matching in private dental offices

被引:26
作者
Wee, Alvin G. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Alison [3 ]
Wu, Wendy [2 ]
Wichman, Christopher S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Nebraska Western Iowa Hlth Care Syst, Maxillofacial Prosthodont, 4101 Woolworth Ave, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
[2] Creighton Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[3] Creighton Univ, Sch Dent, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[4] Creighton Univ, Off Res & Compliance, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. To our knowledge, no data are available on the actual lighting that is used for visual shade matching in private dental offices. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the shade matching practices and interest in continuing education in dental practices and to determine the quantity and quality of the ambient lighting used during visual shade matching in a sample cohort of dentists in private practices. Material and methods. Thirty-two private practices were enrolled, and each completed a 1-page survey on the clinic's shade matching practices. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the ambient lighting in each practice, collecting data on color temperature (Kelvin), color rendering index (CRI), and light intensity (foot candles/fc). A 2-sided nonparametric sign test was used to compare the true median color temperature with the standard (5500 degrees K). A 1-sided t test was used to compare the CRI with the standard (CRI >90) (alpha=.05 for all statistical analyses). Results. All dental practitioners surveyed used mainly visual shade matching in their practices. Of those, 87.5% showed interest in attending continuing education on this topic, with 56.3% preferring a clinical demonstration course. The mean color temperature was 4152.9 degrees K and was significantly different from the standard 5500 degrees K (P<.001). The 1-sided t test indicated that the mean CRI was less than 90 (P=1). The 95% confidence interval for the intensity was 80.7 to 111.6 fc. Conclusions. The ambient light in the majority of the 32 dental private practices measured was not ideal for visual shade matching.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Aday LA, 1996, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, P112
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF SELECTED LIGHT INTENSITIES ON COLOR-PERCEPTION WITHIN THE COLOR RANGE OF NATURAL TEETH [J].
BARNA, GJ ;
TAYLOR, JW ;
KING, GE ;
PELLEU, GB .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1981, 46 (04) :450-453
[3]   Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition [J].
Bayindir, Funda ;
Kuo, Shanglun ;
Johnston, William M. ;
Wee, Alvin G. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 98 (03) :175-185
[4]   DENTAL OPERATIVE LIGHTING AND TOOTH COLOR DISCRIMINATION [J].
BERGEN, SF ;
MCCASLAND, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 94 (01) :130-134
[5]  
Brewer JD., 2004, DENT CLIN N AM, V48, pv, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004, 10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004, DOI 10.1016/J.CDEN.2004.01.004]
[6]   A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHADE-MATCHING PROCEDURES [J].
CULPEPPER, WD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1970, 24 (02) :166-+
[7]   Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources [J].
Curd, Francis M. ;
Jasinevicius, T. Roma ;
Graves, Angela ;
Cox, Viktoria ;
Sadan, Avishai .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 96 (06) :391-396
[8]  
Nakhaei Mohammadreza, 2013, J Contemp Dent Pract, V14, P100
[9]  
Paravina RD, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P73
[10]  
Preston J.D., 1980, Color Science and Dental Art