Household transport demand in a CGE-framework

被引:21
作者
Berg, Charlotte
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Natl Inst Econ Res, S-10362 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
computable general equilibrium; consumer demand; distributional effects; energy taxation; transport;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-006-9050-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to improve the modelling of household demand for transport services in a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. The new extended model is then used for numerical calculations to test how the Swedish economy reacts to a carbon target. Special attention will be given to distributional effects and the connection between labour supply and work journeys in a sparsely populated country like Sweden. A differentiation between trip purposes and trip length, a complementary relationship between work journeys and labour supply, and a subdivision of households by density of population and income influence the numerical results. Our main conclusions from the analysis of a carbon target are that if the carbon tax revenue is recycled by decreasing the employers' social contribution fee, welfare costs are lower than with lumpsum replacements of tax revenue to households. The welfare cost may be reduced even further if work journeys are not additionally taxed as compared to the base year. However, the lower total welfare cost is obtained at the expense of making society more unequal, since both labour tax recycling (cuts in employers' social contributions) and exempting tax on work journeys will make low income groups carry a higher burden. An increased carbon dioxide tax is also shown to increase welfare differences between sparsely populated areas and city regions in Sweden.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 597
页数:25
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, European Journal of Political Economy, DOI 10.1016/0176-2680(94)90032-9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HB TRANSPORT
[3]   The effects on competitiveness of coordinated versus unilateral fiscal policies reducing GHG emissions in the EU: an assessment of a 10% reduction by 2010 using the E3ME model [J].
Barker, T .
ENERGY POLICY, 1998, 26 (14) :1083-1098
[4]  
BERGMAN L, 1996, ENV POLICY POLITICAL, P329
[5]   The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling [J].
Bohringer, C .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (03) :233-248
[6]   Carbon tax simulations using a household demand model [J].
Brännlund, R ;
Nordström, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (01) :211-233
[7]   Taxation, unemployment, and growth: Dynamic welfare effects of "green" policies [J].
Bye, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (01) :1-19
[8]  
CARRARO CM, 1996, J PUBLIC ECON, V672, P141
[9]   ANALYZING GASOLINE DEMAND ELASTICITIES - A SURVEY [J].
DAHL, C ;
STERNER, T .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1991, 13 (03) :203-210
[10]  
DEBORGER B, 2002, WORKING PAPER SERIES