The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making

被引:41
作者
van Maanen, Leendert [1 ,4 ]
Forstmann, Birte U. [1 ,2 ]
Keuken, Max C. [1 ,2 ]
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan [1 ]
Heathcote, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Decision-making; Response-time models; Behavioral experiments; Linear ballistic accumulator; SPEED-ACCURACY TRADEOFF; STATIC MAGNETIC-FIELDS; TRIAL FLUCTUATIONS; DIFFUSION-MODEL; VITAL SIGNS; COGNITION; ACCOUNT; STRESS; NOISE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-015-0563-6
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Despite the widespread use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), few studies have addressed scanner effects on performance. The studies that have examined this question show a wide variety of results. In this article we report analyses of three experiments in which participants performed a perceptual decision-making task both in a traditional setting as well as inside an MRI scanner. The results consistently show that response times increase inside the scanner. Error rates also increase, but to a lesser extent. To reveal the underlying mechanisms that drive the behavioral changes when performing a task inside the MRI scanner, the data were analyzed using the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making. These analyses show that, in the scanner, participants exhibit a slow down of the motor component of the response and have less attentional focus on the task. However, the balance between focus and motor slowing depends on the specific task requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 200
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Introduction to Bayesian statistics
[3]   Effect of the static magnetic field of the MR-scanner on ERPs: Evaluation of visual, cognitive and motor potentials [J].
Assecondi, S. ;
Vanderperren, K. ;
Novitskiy, N. ;
Ramautar, J. R. ;
Fias, W. ;
Staelens, S. ;
Stiers, P. ;
Sunaert, S. ;
Van Huffel, S. ;
Lemahieu, I. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (05) :672-685
[4]   Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA ST guideline: Sodium imaging at 9.4T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability [J].
Atkinson, Ian C. ;
Renteria, Laura ;
Burd, Holly ;
Pliskin, Neil H. ;
Thulborn, Keith R. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (05) :1222-1227
[5]   A SPECIFIC AND ENDURING IMPROVEMENT IN VISUAL-MOTION DISCRIMINATION [J].
BALL, K ;
SEKULER, R .
SCIENCE, 1982, 218 (4573) :697-698
[6]   Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution [J].
Boehm, Udo ;
van Maanen, Leendert ;
Forstmann, Birte ;
van Rijn, Hedderik .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 96 :95-105
[7]   The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ;
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Nieuwenhuis, Sander .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 33 (01) :10-16
[8]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[9]   The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation [J].
Brown, Scott D. ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) :153-178
[10]   Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition [J].
Chajut, E ;
Algom, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (02) :231-248