One-step multi-view spectral clustering with cluster label correlation graph

被引:30
作者
El Hajjar, S. [2 ]
Dornaika, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abdallah, F. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Engn, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, San Sebastian, Spain
[3] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Bilbao, Spain
[4] Lebanese Univ, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] Luxembourg Inst Socioecon Res LISER, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
Multi-view clustering; Nonnegative embedding; Similarity graph; Graph construction; Cluster label space; Spectral representation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.017
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, one-step clustering methods have shown good performance. However, very few one-step approaches have addressed the multi-view case, where an instance may have multiple representations. Data can be represented with multiple heterogeneous views. Clustering with multiple views faces the challenge of how to combine all the different views. A general scheme is to represent the views by view-based graphs and/or a consensus graph. Graphs can be well suited for clustering problems since they can capture the local and global structure of the data. In this paper, we present a novel approach to one-step graph-based multi-view clustering. In contrast to existing graph-based one-step clustering methods, our proposed method introduces two key innovations. First, we build an additional graph by using the cluster label correlation to the graphs associated with the data space. Second, a smoothing constraint is exploited to constrain the cluster-label matrix and make it more consistent with the original data graphs as well as with and label graphs. Experimental results on several public datasets show the efficiency of the proposed approach. All cluster evaluation metrics show significant improvement by applying our method to different types and sizes of datasets. The average improvement (across all datasets) is the difference between the indicator obtained by our approach and the indicator obtained by the most competitive method. The average improvement is approximately 4%, 2%, 3%, and 2% for the Accuracy indicator, the Normalized Mutual Information indicator, the Purity indicator, and the Adjusted Rand index, respectively. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 111
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adefioye Adeshola A., 2013, International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design, V6, P32, DOI 10.1504/IJCBDD.2013.052200
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HP LABS TECHINCAL RE
[3]   Multi Similarity Metric Fusion in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning [J].
Bahrami, Saeedeh ;
Bosaghzadeh, Alireza ;
Dornaika, Fadi .
COMPUTATION, 2019, 7 (01)
[4]   Semi-Supervised Multi-view clustering based on orthonormality-constrained nonnegative matrix factorization [J].
Cai, Hao ;
Liu, Bo ;
Xiao, Yanshan ;
Lin, Luyue .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 536 :171-184
[5]   On a Simple and Efficient Approach to Probability Distribution Function Aggregation [J].
Cai, Mengya ;
Lin, Yingzi ;
Han, Bin ;
Liu, Changjun ;
Zhang, Wenjun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2017, 47 (09) :2444-2453
[6]  
Chen MS, 2020, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V34, P3513
[7]   Low-Rank Tensor Graph Learning for Multi-View Subspace Clustering [J].
Chen, Yongyong ;
Xiao, Xiaolin ;
Peng, Chong ;
Lu, Guangming ;
Zhou, Yicong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) :92-104
[8]   Multi-view spectral clustering via constrained nonnegative embedding [J].
El Hajjar, S. ;
Dornaika, F. ;
Abdallah, F. .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2022, 78 :209-217
[9]  
Forster R., 2006, DOCUMENT CLUSTERING
[10]   Multi-view spectral clustering via integrating nonnegative embedding and spectral embedding [J].
Hu, Zhanxuan ;
Nie, Feiping ;
Wang, Rong ;
Li, Xuelong .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 55 :251-259