Performance Analysis on Packet Delivery Ratio and End-To-End Delay of Different Network Topologies in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)

被引:22
作者
Khan, Muhammad Farhan [1 ]
Felemban, Emad A. [1 ]
Qaisar, Saad
Ali, Salman
机构
[1] Umm Al Qura Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Syst, Dept Comp Engn, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
来源
2013 IEEE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD-HOC AND SENSOR NETWORKS (MSN 2013) | 2013年
关键词
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs); packet delivery ratio; end-to-end delay; network topology;
D O I
10.1109/MSN.2013.74
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are receiving more popularity in mission critical and delay sensitive industrial applications because they offer low latency and reliable message transmission. In applications like gas leakage detection, monitoring of pressure and industrial process control etc. reliable communication between sink and the sensing nodes is very important. In wireless sensor networks sensing nodes are placed very densely in different environments and mostly with no defined network topology. In industrial setup, the placement of the sensing nodes plays a very important role, most importantly it increases overall system throughput by efficiently transmitting the calibrated readings and providing maximum security to the industrial devices. In this paper we aim to investigate, how different topological settings effects packet delivery ratio (PDR) and End-to-End delay in wireless sensor networks? This paper also focuses on the performance study of three different network topological settings for mission critical applications. We evaluated the performance of wireless sensor network (WSN) by placing the sensor nodes in three different topological designs namely Linear, Tier one and Split Tier one.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P LREC MAY, DOI 10.1109/WoWMoM.2012.6263784
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, P 5 IFIP INT C WIR O
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012 IEEE COL COMM C
[4]   Energy efficiency of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard in dense wireless microsensor networks: Modeling and improvement perspectives [J].
Bougard, B ;
Catthoor, F ;
Daly, DC ;
Chandrakasan, A ;
Dehaene, W .
DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :196-201
[5]   An Overview on Wireless Sensor Networks Technology and Evolution [J].
Buratti, Chiara ;
Conti, Andrea ;
Dardari, Davide ;
Verdone, Roberto .
SENSORS, 2009, 9 (09) :6869-6896
[6]  
Chaczko Zenon, 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Broadband Communications, Information Technology & Biomedical Applications, P215, DOI 10.1109/BROADCOM.2008.78
[7]  
Chatzigiannakis I., 2006, Proceeding of the 4th ACM Workshop on Mobility Management and Wireless Access, P52, DOI DOI 10.1145/1164783.1164793
[8]  
Chaudhary D. D., 2012, 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA 2012). Proceedings, P703, DOI 10.1109/ICIEA.2012.6360816
[9]  
Fotue D, 2012, 2012 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL INDOOR AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), P758, DOI 10.1109/PIMRC.2012.6362885
[10]  
Geethapriya S, 2013, 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICCSP), P9, DOI 10.1109/iccsp.2013.6577004