Antimicrobial Efficacy of Propolis in Comparison to Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
作者
Almadi, Khalid H. [1 ]
Ahmed, Muhammad Adeel [2 ]
Ghazal, Tuba [3 ]
Jouhar, Rizwan [2 ]
Alkahtany, Mazen F. [1 ]
Abduljabbar, Tariq [4 ]
Vohra, Fahim [4 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Div Endodont, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Univ, Dept Restorat Dent & Endodont, Coll Dent, Al Hasa 31982, Saudi Arabia
[3] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dr Ishrat Ul Ebad Khan Inst Oral Hlth Sci, Dept Community Dent, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Res Chair Biol Res Dent Hlth, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
propolis; polyphenolic compound; chlorhexidine; intracanal medicament; E; faecalis; systematic review; INTRACANAL MEDICAMENT; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; GEL;
D O I
10.3390/app11083469
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Propolis is proposed to possess antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties, which can be used in endodontic applications. However, evidence on its efficacy in comparison to chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is controversial. The aim of the current study was to compare the antibacterial efficacy of Propolis and chlorhexidine as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis in extracted human permanent teeth. The focused question was, "Does Propolis show better antibacterial efficacy than Chlorhexidine (CHX) as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis in extracted human permanent teeth?". Databases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, ISI-Web of Science were searched from 1990 to August 2020 using different combinations of the following keywords: "Propolis", "Intracanal medicament", "E. faecalis", "Antibacterial activity" and "Chlorhexidine". Ten studies fulfilling inclusion criteria were considered for qualitative analysis, followed by quantitative analysis of eight studies. Heterogeneity was calculated for colony forming units (CFU) of E. Faecalis using the Chi-square test and I-2 statistics. Forest plots were computed reporting standard mean difference (SMD) of outcomes and 95% confidence intervals. The overall mean difference for CFU of E. faecalis showed a statistically significant difference between the antibacterial efficacy of Propolis and CHX (SMD = 3.20 [1.70, 4.69] Z = 4.20; p < 0.001). CHX showed superior antibacterial efficacy against E. faecalis compared to Propolis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Applications of Propolis in Dentistry: A Review [J].
Abbasi, Amir Jalal ;
Mohammadi, Farnoush ;
Bayat, Mohamad ;
Gema, Shimelis Megersa ;
Ghadirian, Hannaneh ;
Seifi, Hasti ;
Bayat, Hananeh ;
Bahrami, Naghmeh .
ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 28 (04) :505-512
[2]  
Ahmed M.A., 2012, J PAK DENT ASS, V21, P104
[3]  
Ahmed MA, 2017, PAK ORAL DENT J, V37, P483
[4]  
Ahmed N, 2013, J PAK DENT ASS, V22, P206
[5]  
Arslan S, 2011, SAUDI MED J, V32, P479
[6]   Effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: A laboratory study [J].
Awawdeh, Lama ;
AL-Beitawi, Maha ;
Hammad, Mohammad .
AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2009, 35 (02) :52-58
[7]  
Bazvand Leila, 2014, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V11, P469
[8]   An in Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of 2% Chlorhexidine Gel, Propolis and Calcium Hydroxide Against Enterococcus falecalis in Human Root Dentin [J].
Bhandari, Sonam ;
Ashwini, T. S. ;
Patil, Chetan R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (11) :ZC60-ZC63
[9]  
Bolla N., 2012, J Int Dent Med Res, V5, P14
[10]   Antimicrobial effects of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and propolis on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans [J].
Carbajal Mejia, Jeison B. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2014, 5 (03) :194-200