Capturing the true burden of dystonia on patients - The Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58)

被引:74
作者
Cano, SJ
Warner, TT
Linacre, JM
Bhatia, KP
Thompson, AJ
Fitzpatrick, R
Hobart, JC
机构
[1] Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Clin Neurosci, London, England
[2] Univ Chicago, MESA, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] UCL, Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, Inst Neurol, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] UCL, Neurol Oucome Measures Unit, Inst Neurol, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[6] Peninsula Med Sch, Dept Clin Neurosci, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.WNL.0000142962.11881.26
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To develop a new rating scale for measuring the health impact of cervical dystonia (CD) that includes patients' perceptions and complements existing observer dependent clinician rating scales. Methods: Scale development was in three stages. In Stage 1, a large pool of items was generated from patient interviews (n = 25), expert opinion, and literature review. In Stage 2, these items were administered by postal survey to people with CD. The resulting data were analyzed using Rasch item analysis to construct, from the item pool, a rating scale that satisfied criteria for rigorous measurement. In Stage 3, the measurement properties of this rating scale were examined in an independent sample of people with CD. Results: In Stage 1, 150 items concerning the health impact of CD were generated. In Stage 2, 556 people completed questionnaires (87% response rate) and a 58-item rating scale measuring the health impact of CD in eight areas was constructed ( CD Impact Profile, CDIP-58). In Stage 3, CDIP-58 data from 391 people (87% response rate) were received. Analyses supported the measurement of eight unidimensional constructs (infit mean square range 0.62 to 1.50), item calibration (33.37 to 67.56), and patient separation statistics (2.59 to 3.38). Items demonstrated stable calibrations in subgroups of people with CD supporting the stability of the CDIP-58. Conclusions: The CDIP-58 is a reliable and valid patient-based rating scale measuring the health impact of CD in eight health dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:1629 / 1633
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Controversy and the Rasch model - A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? [J].
Andrich, D .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (01) :7-16
[3]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[4]  
Bertrand C M, 1988, Adv Neurol, V50, P637
[5]   VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A RATING-SCALE FOR THE PRIMARY TORSION DYSTONIAS [J].
BURKE, RE ;
FAHN, S ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
BRESSMAN, SB ;
MOSKOWITZ, C ;
FRIEDMAN, J .
NEUROLOGY, 1985, 35 (01) :73-77
[6]   Patient-based outcomes of cervical dystonia: A review of rating scales [J].
Cano, SJ ;
Hobart, JC ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Bhatia, K ;
Thompson, AJ ;
Warner, TT .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2004, 19 (09) :1054-1059
[7]  
CONSKY E, 1990, Neurology, V40, P445
[8]  
GELB DJ, 1989, NEUROLOGY, V39, P82
[9]   BEYOND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY RELIABILITY - RATIONALE AND USERS GUIDE FOR MULTITRAIT ANALYSIS PROGRAM ON THE MICROCOMPUTER [J].
HAYS, RD ;
HAYASHI, T .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1990, 22 (02) :167-175
[10]  
Hobart J, 2003, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V74, P22