Screening for the ADHD Phenotype Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Clinical Sample of Newly Referred Children and Adolescents

被引:8
作者
Jose Carballo, Juan [1 ]
Rodriguez-Blanco, Lucia [1 ]
Garcia-Nieto, Rebeca [1 ]
Baca-Garcia, Enrique [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ); ADHD; screening; clinical sample; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; MENTAL-HEALTH; BEHAVIOR-CHECKLIST; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; NATIONAL SAMPLE; SDQ; VALIDITY; PARENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/1087054714561858
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the screening ability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for ADHD subtypes in a clinical sample. Method: Parents of 523 children (3 to 17 years old) referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services completed the Spanish version of the SDQ and the ADHD Rating Scale-IV. Receiver operating curve (ROC) curve analyses and likelihood ratios (LRs) were conducted. Results: The LR results indicated that the 8/10 cutoff showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. The sensitivity of the SDQ 8/10 cutoff for the three subtypes was significantly different: 84.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = [75.58, 89.90]) of ADHD combined subtype (ADHD-Co), 25.0% (95% CI = [17.55, 34.30]) of ADHD predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-I), and 77.8% (95% CI = [68.71, 84.83]) of ADHD predominantly hyperactive/impulsive subtype (ADHD-H). Sex and age differences were found. These screening differences were also found when using the 7/10 cutoff or the SDQ predictive algorithm. Conclusion: Our study supports the use of the SDQ in the screening for ADHD. However, not all ADHD subtypes are equally screened.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1039
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Family income, parenting styles and child behavioural-emotional outcomes
    Dooley, Martin
    Stewart, Jennifer
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (02) : 145 - 162
  • [12] The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China
    Du Y.
    Kou J.
    Coghill D.
    [J]. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2 (1)
  • [13] DuPaul GJ, 1998, ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation
  • [14] Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire3-4 in 3-year-old preschoolers
    Ezpeleta, Lourdes
    Granero, Roser
    de la Osa, Nuria
    Penelo, Eva
    Domenech, Josep M.
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 54 (03) : 282 - 291
  • [15] Bullón FF, 2012, REV ESP SALUD PUBLIC, V86, P445, DOI 10.4321/S1135-57272012000400011
  • [16] Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a national sample of US children
    Froehlich, Tanya E.
    Lanphear, Bruce P.
    Epstein, Jeffery N.
    Barbaresi, William J.
    Katusic, Slavica K.
    Kahn, Robert S.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2007, 161 (09): : 857 - 864
  • [17] Gender differences in ADHD: A meta-analysis and critical review
    Gaub, M
    Carlson, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 36 (08) : 1036 - 1045
  • [18] Gershon J, 2002, J Atten Disord, V5, P143, DOI 10.1177/108705470200500302
  • [19] Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka
    Goodman, R
    Renfrew, D
    Mullick, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 9 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [20] The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note
    Goodman, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1997, 38 (05): : 581 - 586